Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Nowadays, the world's scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in different scientific fields. In such environment, it is essential to know which databases are equally efficient and objective for literature searches. It seems that two most extensive databases are Web of Science and Scopus. Besides searching the literature, these two databases used to rank journals in terms of their productivity and the total citations received to indicate the journals impact, prestige or influence. This article attempts to provide a comprehensive comparison of these databases to answer frequent questions which researchers ask, such as: How Web of Science and Scopus are different? In which aspects these two databases are similar? Or, if the researchers are forced to choose one of them, which one should they prefer? For answering these questions, these two databases will be compared based on their qualitative and quantitative characteristics. This record was migrated from the OpenDepot repository service in June, 2017 before shutting down.
{"references": ["Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18-26. doi: 10.5539/ass.v9n5p18"]}
[SDE] Environmental Sciences, FOS: Computer and information sciences, H Social Sciences (General), citation tracking, [SHS.EDU] Humanities and Social Sciences/Education, T2 Technology (General) / műszaki tudományok általában, web of science, scopus, database, citations, provenance, coverage, searching, citation tracking, impact factor, indexing, h-index, researcher profile, researcher ID, provenance, coverage, K.3.2, Computer Science - Computers and Society, H Social Sciences (General) / társadalomtudomány általában, Computers and Society (cs.CY), researcher ID, [INFO.INFO-DB] Computer Science [cs]/Databases [cs.DB], Digital Libraries (cs.DL), h-index, AI Indexes (General) / indexek, impact factor, database, searching, scopus, researcher profile, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, 001, citations, web of science, mutatók, indexing, jel: jel:Z0, jel: jel:Z1, jel: jel:Z18, jel: jel:I0, jel: jel:I23, jel: jel:I2, jel: jel:Z00, jel: jel:O1, jel: jel:O10
[SDE] Environmental Sciences, FOS: Computer and information sciences, H Social Sciences (General), citation tracking, [SHS.EDU] Humanities and Social Sciences/Education, T2 Technology (General) / műszaki tudományok általában, web of science, scopus, database, citations, provenance, coverage, searching, citation tracking, impact factor, indexing, h-index, researcher profile, researcher ID, provenance, coverage, K.3.2, Computer Science - Computers and Society, H Social Sciences (General) / társadalomtudomány általában, Computers and Society (cs.CY), researcher ID, [INFO.INFO-DB] Computer Science [cs]/Databases [cs.DB], Digital Libraries (cs.DL), h-index, AI Indexes (General) / indexek, impact factor, database, searching, scopus, researcher profile, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, 001, citations, web of science, mutatók, indexing, jel: jel:Z0, jel: jel:Z1, jel: jel:Z18, jel: jel:I0, jel: jel:I23, jel: jel:I2, jel: jel:Z00, jel: jel:O1, jel: jel:O10
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1K | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts