Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Critical Making Special Issue

Authors: Critical Making Consortium;

Critical Making Special Issue

Abstract

Critical Making is a research project that adds scientific insights into the potential of the maker movement. By focusing on critical and socially responsible making, it shows how global maker communities can offer new opportunities for young makers of all genders to contribute to an open society via open source innovation.The research project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020, and the consortium consists of five partners: The Centre for Social Innovation (ZSI), Global Innovation Gathering (GIG), VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Technische Universität Berlin (TUB), and Wikifactory (WIF). This special issue summarises the project's outcomes on the various aspects of Critical Making in a collection of scientific publications, which approach Critical Making from different angles. The research focus of the Critical Making project has been on the exploration of responsible innovation processes in the global maker community. More specifically aspects of gender and inclusiveness, openness, and the engagement of young people have been at the centre of our participatory research approach. This led to a series of academic findings, presented at conferences and published in academic outlets. Participatory research also led to very practical output formats and alternative publishing formats, next to the scientific publications. The Critical Making zine is such an example. Next to the findings directly derived from the Critical Making project and our intense collaboration with the global maker community, this summary also includes references to relevant work we encountered during our Critical Making journey. We would like to highlight some of the influential experts - academics and practitioners - who have been and keep exploring critical making practices from different perspectives. This ranges from more artistic approaches of Garnet Hertz to feminist and intersectional views of Stefanie Wuschitz. In the end, we hope that this collection of Critical Making publications inspires scholars to further explore and highlight the potential of responsible grassroots innovations in makerspaces.

Keywords

maker movement

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 34
    download downloads 29
  • 34
    views
    29
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
34
29
Green