Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Cultivated Land Balance Policy (CLBP) has led to the “better land occupied and worse land supplemented” program. At the same time, the current field-scale cultivated land quality (CLQ) evaluation cannot meet the work requirements of the CLBP. To this end, this study selected 24 newly added farmland in Fuping County and performed eight different high quality farming layer construction experiments to improve the CLQ. A new comprehensive model was constructed on a field scale to evaluate the CLQ using different tests from multi-dimensional perspectives of soil fertility, engineering, environment, and ecology, and to determine the best test mode. The results showed that after the test, around 62% of the cultivated land improved by one level, and the average cultivated land quality level and quality index of the test area increased by 0.63 and 30.63, respectively. The treatment of “woody peat + rotten crop straw + biostimulation regulator II + conventional fertilization” had the best effect on the improvement of organic matter, soil aggregates, and soil microbial activity, and was the best treatment method. In general, application of soil amendments, such as woody peat when constructing high quality farmland, could quickly improve CLQ, and field-scale CLQ evaluation model constructed from a multi-dimensional perspective could accurately assess the true quality of farmland and allow managers to improve and manage arable land resources under CLBP.
Scale (ratio), cultivated land quality evaluation, Agricultural engineering, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Engineering, Soil Evaluation, Agricultural land, Soil water, Arable land, cultivated land quality evaluation; field scale; high-quality farming layer; woody peat, Global and Planetary Change, Global Analysis of Ecosystem Services and Land Use, Geography, Ecology, S, high-quality farming layer, Life Sciences, Land Suitability, Land-Use Suitability Assessment Using GIS, Land reclamation, Agriculture, woody peat, Soil Erosion and Agricultural Sustainability, Agricultural Land Use, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, Physical Sciences, Quality (philosophy), field scale, Cartography, Soil Science, Epistemology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Soil quality, Environmental science, Crop Suitability, Agroforestry, Biology, Soil science, Peat, Topsoil, Philosophy, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Land use
Scale (ratio), cultivated land quality evaluation, Agricultural engineering, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Engineering, Soil Evaluation, Agricultural land, Soil water, Arable land, cultivated land quality evaluation; field scale; high-quality farming layer; woody peat, Global and Planetary Change, Global Analysis of Ecosystem Services and Land Use, Geography, Ecology, S, high-quality farming layer, Life Sciences, Land Suitability, Land-Use Suitability Assessment Using GIS, Land reclamation, Agriculture, woody peat, Soil Erosion and Agricultural Sustainability, Agricultural Land Use, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, Physical Sciences, Quality (philosophy), field scale, Cartography, Soil Science, Epistemology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Soil quality, Environmental science, Crop Suitability, Agroforestry, Biology, Soil science, Peat, Topsoil, Philosophy, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Land use
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 6 | |
| downloads | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts