Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Grimothea undetermined

Authors: Tiwari, Shivam; Padate, Vinay P.; Cubelio, Sherine Sonia;

Grimothea undetermined

Abstract

Grimothea sp. (Figures 2 (c), 7) Material examined 1 female (3.2 mm PCL, 2.7 mm CW) (IO/SS/ANO/00143), south-eastern Bay of Bengal, off South Andaman Island, FORVSS stn 334I09, 11.79°N, 92.34°E, 147 m depth, Naturalist̍s dredge, coll. Vinu Jacob, 14 January 2015. Description Carapace. PCL 1.2 times width, dorsal surface gently convex transversely; main transverse ridges mostly uninterrupted; ridges and striae with dense short setae and a few longer iridescent setae. Gastric region with 5 pairs of epigastric spines and 1 median spine. Cervical grooves distinct. Hepatic region with 2 spines, posterior spine located adjacent to parahepatic spine; anterobranchial and postcervical regions each with 1 small spine; lateral part of posterior branchial region with 7 transverse ridges including posterior submarginal ridge. Intestinal region without stria. Frontal margin sinuous, strongly oblique, with sharp ridge running obliquely from lateral base of supraocular spine up to level of parahepatic spine. Anterolateral spine not reaching sinus between rostrum and supraocular spines, followed by 1 distinctly shorter spine on anterolateral margin. Lateral margins subparallel; branchial margins with 5 spines (3 on anterior branchial margin, third spine minute; 2 on posterior branchial margin); third spine smallest (Figures 2 (c), 7(a,b)). Rostrum spiniform, 0.4 times as long as PCL, directed nearly horizontally in lateral view; dorsal surface sparsely covered with short scales, lateral margins slightly crenulated along distal portion; supraocular spines moderately long, slender, parallel in dorsal view, half as long as rostrum (Figures 2 (c), 7(a,b)). Pterygostomian flap inflated, partially visible in dorsal view, with long and short transverse ridges, anterior margin terminating in 1 spinule (Figure 7 (a,b)). Sternum. Sternal plastron widest at sternite 7. Thoracic sternite 3 4.8 times as wide as long, 0.4 times as wide as sternite 4; anterior margin serrated, with 2 sinuous lobes separated by wide V-shaped median notch. Sternite 4 with anterior margin contiguous to sternite 3 along half of its length. Sternites 4–6 smooth; sternite 7 lateral portion with granular patch (Figure 7 (c)). Pleon. Smooth, tergites 2 and 3 each with deep median transverse groove; tergite 2 with 8 spines on anterior ridge (Figure 7 (a)); tergite 4 smooth, with 1 pair of minute submedian pits anteriorly; tergite 5 with 2 pairs of minute submedian pits alternating with 2 uninterrupted transverse ridges, posterior ridge longer; tergite 6 with 1 medially interrupted squamiform ridge. Telson wider than long (Figure 7 (d)). Eye. Moderately large; cornea dilated, lightly pigmented; maximum diameter 4.2 times distance between rostrum and supraocular spine, 0.4 times distance between anterolateral spines, 0.3 times PCL. Ocular peduncle without striae on dorsal surface; eyelash short (Figure 7 (a)). Antennule. Antennular peduncle article 1 2.2 times as long as wide, distinctly overreaching distal corneal margin; distomesial spine shorter than distolateral spine; lateral margin with 2 spines, first lateral spine distinctly overreaching distal spines, second lateral spine very short, located anterior to midlength of article; ventral surface with a few scattered, short squamiform ridges (Figure 7 (e)). Antenna. Antennal peduncle insertion visible in dorsal view, peduncle not reaching distal corneal margin. Article 1 fused with lateral margin of epistome (Figure 7 (e)), distomesial spine reaching distal margin of article 2. Article 2 with distomesial spine overreaching distal margin of article 4, mesial margin armed with short spine; distolateral spine overreaching distal margin of article 3. Articles 3 and 4 unarmed (Figure 7 (e, f)). Mxp 3. Ischium length 1.8 times as long as merus, disto-flexor and disto-extensor angles terminating in sharp spine; crista dentata with 20–21 denticles. Merus flexor margin with 2 spines, proximal spine located at midlength distinctly longer, disto-extensor angle unarmed. Carpus, propodus and dactylus unarmed (Figure 7 (g)). P1–4. Missing. Distribution Presently known only from Andaman Sea, 147 m depth (Figure 1). Remarks The unidentified specimen is here assigned to Grimothea because of the fusion of the first antennal peduncle article with the lateral margin of the epistome, and the unarmed, inflated pterygostomian flap visible in the dorsal view (although the latter character is seen only in a few congeneric species) (Machordom et al. 2022). Like G. krishaha sp. nov., this specimen is morphologically close to G. lipkeholthuisi (Hendrickx and Ayón-Parente, 2010) and M. macrobrachia (Hendrickx, 2003) from the Eastern Pacific Ocean. Further, Grimothea sp. differs from G. krishaha sp. nov. in the following characters: (1) Carapace with 2 hepatic spines (vs 1 spine in G. krishaha sp. nov.); (2) Frontal margin sinuous, strongly oblique with sharp ridge running obliquelyposteriorly from lateral base of supraocular spine to parahepatic spine (vs frontal margin slightly oblique, without sharp ridge in G. krishaha sp. nov.); (3) Anterolateral spine not reaching sinus between rostrum and supraocular spines (vs reaching sinus in G. krishaha sp. nov.); (4) Pleonal tergites 2–3 with deep median transverse groove; tergite 4 smooth (vs tergites 2–4 with deep median transverse groove in G. krishaha sp. nov.); (5) Distomesial spine of antennular peduncle shorter than distolateral spine (vs distal spines subequal in length in G. krishaha sp. nov.). In addition to the above, it resembles G. lipkeholthuisi in the presence of a granular patch laterally on thoracic sternite 7 and a transverse row of spines on pleonal tergite 2. Moreover, it shares the absence of spines on the posterior margin of carapace with G. macrobrachia. Morphological differences from the Eastern Pacific species are mentioned above in the ′Remarks̍ for G. krishaha sp. nov.

Published as part of Tiwari, Shivam, Padate, Vinay P. & Cubelio, Sherine Sonia, 2023, Chirostyloid and galatheoid squat lobsters (Decapoda: Anomura) from Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India, with three new species, pp. 520-556 in Journal of Natural History 57 (9 - 12) on pages 534-536, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2023.2192429, http://zenodo.org/record/7975359

Keywords

Grimothea, Arthropoda, Decapoda, Animalia, Munididae, Grimothea undetermined, Biodiversity, Malacostraca, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
    download downloads 1
  • 3
    views
    1
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
1
Green