Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Reticulipeurus (Forcipurellus) longistylus Gustafsson & Zou 2023, new species

Authors: Gustafsson, Daniel R.; Zou, Fasheng;

Reticulipeurus (Forcipurellus) longistylus Gustafsson & Zou 2023, new species

Abstract

Reticulipeurus (Forcipurellus) longistylus new species (Figs 32–39, 43) Type host. Arborophila rufogularis guttata Delacour & Jabouille, 1928 —rufous-throated partridge. Type locality. “Indochina”. Other hosts. Arborophila rufogularis subspecies (Blyth, 1849). Arborophila rufogularis intermedia (Blyth, 1855). Arborophila rufogularis tickelli (Hume, 1880). Diagnosis. Reticulipeurus (Forcipurellus) longistylus can be separated from the other species in the subgenus by the following combination of characters: head somewhat slender (Fig. 34); Male pedicel swollen and shortened compared to female (Figs 34–35); male flagellomere I expanded distally (Fig. 34); male mesosome narrow (Fig. 36); ventral sclerite of male genitalia with narrowly rounded anterior margin (Fig. 37); male gonopore almost reaching distal margin of mesosome (Fig. 37); male parameres of distinct shape (Fig. 38); central section of female vulval margin more prominently bulging (Fig. 39); male stylus elongated and slender, not spatulate, and postero-lateral corners of male abdominal segment XI extended slightly posteriorly (Fig. 43). Description. Preantennal head somewhat narrowed (Fig. 34). Male scape longer than female (Fig. 35), much wider but not otherwise modified; male pedicel short and stout; male flagellomere I with distal extension. Head chaetotaxy as in Fig. 24. Lateral margins of temples more or less parallel in male. Thoracic and abdominal segments and chaetotaxy as in Figs 32–33. Distal abdomen of male as in Fig. 43; sternal plate VII apparently fused to from subgenital plate medianly, but this is not clear in examined specimens and plates may be separate; stylus long, elongated; distal margin of segment XI sinuously concave, lateral corners slightly extended distally. Male genitalia as in Figs 36–38. Distal rugosity of mesosome somewhat coarse, extensive. Ventral sclerite with narrowly convex anterior margin and two visible gpmes on each side. Gonopore almost reaching distal margin of mesosome. Parameres broad, curved, with elongated heads; pst1 near distal end of paramere. Female sternal plate VII without median bulge on distal margin (Fig. 39). Median bulge of vulval margin narrow, prominent, with 5–7 vss on each side; lateral lobes with 19–25 long, slender vms on each side. Lateral margin of claspers with 5–8 lateral setae on each side. Specimens from different host subspecies overlap extensively in vulval chaetotaxy. Measurements as in Table 1. Type material examined. Ex Arborophila rufogularis guttata [as A. rufogularis laotiana or A. rufogularis laotianae]: Holotype 1♁, “ Indochina ”, 16 Jul. 1930, no collector, Brit. Mus. 1970-558, NHMUK010682710 (NHML). Paratypes. 1♁, skin, locality unknown, no date, coll. R. S. Balter, Brit. Mus. 1971-493, NHMUK010682705 (NHML). Ex Arborophila rufogularis subspecies: 1♀, “Indochina”, 16 Jul. 1930, “spirit mat.”, no collector, NHMUK010682704 (NHML). Non-type material examined. Ex Arborophila rufogularis intermedia: 2♁, 3♀, Burma [= Myanmar], 1898, coll. R. Meinertzhagen, 3605, NHMUK010682712 (NHML). Ex Arborophila rufogularis tickelli: 4♀, Tenasserim, Myanmar, Oct. 1897, coll. R. Meinertzhagen, 3601, NHMUK010682716 (NHML). Etymology. The species epithet is formed by “ longus ”, Latin for “long, and “ stylus ”, Latin for “stake”, referring to the relatively long stylus of this species compared to those of other members of the subgenus. Remarks. The type host subspecies has been selected based on the best preserved males, despite the lack of females from this host subspecies. The specimen on slide NHMUK010682704 has the same collection data as those of the holotype and may represent a female from the type host subspecies, but the subspecies is not explicit on the slide label. Specimens from the other two host subspecies are considered conspecific with the type series, as no significant differences have been found among them. Females are illustrated based on specimens from A. rufogularis intermedia.

Published as part of Gustafsson, Daniel R. & Zou, Fasheng, 2023, Species of Reticulipeurus Kéler, 1958 (Phthiraptera, Ischnocera, Oxylipeurus- complex) parasitic on species of Arborophila, with description of a new subgenus and three new species, pp. 496-520 in Zootaxa 5284 (3) on pages 504-514, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5284.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/7929559

Related Organizations
Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Philopteridae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Reticulipeurus, Psocodea, Reticulipeurus longistylus, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 159
    download downloads 1
  • 159
    views
    1
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
159
1
Related to Research communities