Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This is an Expression of Interest (EoI) for a Working-Group on Multilingualism and Languages Biases prepared for the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA). EoI was submitted 27 April 2023 and it was prepared and supported by a working-group including representatives from 27 CoARA member organisations: Federation of Finnish Learned Societies, Marie Curie Alumni Association, OPERAS AISBL, Coimbra Group, European Civil Society Platform for Multilingualism, Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan, Initiative for Science in Europe, Eurodoc, Universities Norway, EuroScience, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU), ENRESSH, EASSH, Leiden University/CWTS/UNESCO Chair in Diversity and Inclusion in Global Science, Hanken School of Economics, University of Milan, University of Antwerp Centre for R&D Monitoring (ECOOM), TOUR4EU, University of Turku, Tampere University, Italian national agency for the evaluation of universities and research institutes (ANVUR), Research Foundation Flanders, ANR (French National Research Agency).
Language bias, Multilingualism, CoARA, Research assessment
Language bias, Multilingualism, CoARA, Research assessment
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 54 | |
| downloads | 43 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts