Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Mountain forests only cover ~25% of all mountain regions but host disproportionally more species compared to other mountain ecosystems. While remote sensing shows that mountain forest loss rate increased linearly from 2001 to 2020, the impact of forest loss on mountain species, and the effectiveness of formal protection, remain unclear. We find that forest loss impacted unevenly on biodiversity, with about one-quarter of mountain forest species experiencing disproportionate habitat loss and narrowly distributed species being most affected. Although susceptible to wildfires, protected forests were largely effective against forest loss. We report a substantial mismatch between mountains that are largely protected and mountains comprising rich biodiversity. Increased conservation efforts are required to safeguard montane biodiversity from forest loss in line with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 8 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts