Downloads provided by UsageCounts
pmid: 35984842
pmc: PMC9432753
Various stakeholders in science have put research integrity high on their agenda. Among them, research funders are prominently placed to foster research integrity by requiring that the organizations and individual researchers they support make an explicit commitment to research integrity. Moreover, funders need to adopt appropriate research integrity practices themselves. To facilitate this, we recommend that funders develop and implement a Research Integrity Promotion Plan (RIPP). This Consensus View offers a range of examples of how funders are already promoting research integrity, distills 6 core topics that funders should cover in a RIPP, and provides guidelines on how to develop and implement a RIPP. We believe that the 6 core topics we put forward will guide funders towards strengthening research integrity policy in their organization and guide the researchers and research organizations they fund.
Humans ; Policy ; Research Design ; Research Personnel, 000, 330, QH301-705.5, research integrity, Research Personnel, funding agencies, Policy, Research Design, research integrity promotion plan, Humans, research integrity policy, Biology (General), Consensus View
Humans ; Policy ; Research Design ; Research Personnel, 000, 330, QH301-705.5, research integrity, Research Personnel, funding agencies, Policy, Research Design, research integrity promotion plan, Humans, research integrity policy, Biology (General), Consensus View
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 55 | |
| downloads | 60 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts