Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Fissidens strictidens Bruggeman-Nannenga & Müller 2020, sp. nov.

Authors: Bruggeman-Nannenga, Maria A.; Müller, Frank;

Fissidens strictidens Bruggeman-Nannenga & Müller 2020, sp. nov.

Abstract

Fissidens strictidens Brugg. -Nann. & Frank Müll., sp. nov. (Figs 1; 2) DIAGNOSIS. — The species is characterized by pluripapillose cells and limbidia restricted to the vaginant lamina. It differs from it congeners by stiff, erect, almost completely divided peristome teeth. HOLOTYPE. — Myanmar, Kachin State, Hponkan Razi, epiphytic in evergreen broadleaved forest, mixed with F. serratus Müll.Hal. and F. pokhrensis Nork. ex S.S. Kumar, 1565 m, 27.548702N, 97.032742E, 14.X.2014, J. Kluge & P. K. Kine 14-031-001b-B (holo-, DR; iso-, L). DESCRIPTION Growing scattered between other mosses and hepatics on bark. Stems 3-4 × 1.5-2 mm, hardly heterocaulous, pinnately foliated, unbranched, some stems with perichaetial branches in axils of subperichaetial and perichaetial leaves of old perichaetia, without or with weak central strand. Rhizoids Brown, smooth. Axillary nodules Not differentiated. Leaves Close, up to 11 pairs,hardly crispate when dry, elliptic-lanceolate with acute-acuminate apex, (0.9-)1-1.2(-1.3) × (0.2-) 0.3 mm, 3.5-4.1(-5.2) times as long as wide, margin crenulate, limbate on the vaginant laminae of all well-developed leaves of perichaetial stems, limbidium reaching ± ½ the length of the vaginant lamina in perichaetial leaves, in mid leaves consisting of a few elongated cells only, marginal, reaching insertion of vaginant laminae, up to 19 µm wide, unistratose; vaginant laminae ± ½ the leaf length, at base less wide than the stem, rounded at insertion, ± decurrent, unistratose, slightly unequal; basal part of dorsal lamina rounded, reaching the insertion, not decurrent; dorsal and apical lamina unistratose. Costa Percurrent to excurrent, in cross-section bryoides-type. Lumina Of mid dorsal laminal cells (3-)3.5-5(-6) × (2-)3-4.5(-5.5) µm, 3-4 papillose. Of mid vaginant laminal cells oblong, (5-)5.5-8 (-9.5) × (2.5-)3-4.5(-5.0) µm, 3-4 papillose. Gemmae Not observed. Fertile parts Perigonia and perichaetia on the same stem, perigonia terminal on ± stemless, 0.4-0.5 mm long branches; antheridia 200 µm long; perichaetia terminal on main stems and short, circa 0.35-0.4 mm long branches, archegonia 250-265 µm long, perichaetial leaves 1.5 mm long; calyptra not observed. Sporophyte, seta 2 mm long, smooth, 1 per perichaetium; capsule erect, 0.6 × 0.3 mm, with ± 32 columns of quadraticoblong exothecial cells, with stomata; peristome anomalous, teeth erect, ± completely divided (Fig. 1A); operculum not observed; spores subglobose, (7.0-)7.5-9.5(-11.5) × (5.0-)6- 7.5(-10.5) µm, papillose. DISCUSSION The new species is characterized by its corticolous habitat, pluripapillose cells and limbidia restricted to the vaginant lamina. The limbidia are found in upper and mid leaves of perichaetial stems and extend about half the length of the vaginant laminae in perichaetial leaves. Its best diagnostic characters are the stiff, erect, almost completely divided peristome teeth (Fig. 1A, B). Gametophytically it closely resembles F.linearis var. obscurirete, F.pokhrensis and F.kurzii. All three have pluripapillose cells, but differ from the new species in having scariosus-type peristomes. Species with pluripapillose cells and limbidia restricted to the vaginant laminae belong to the gametophytically heterogeneous subgenus Aloma (Pursell & Bruggeman-Nannenga 2004). The sporophyte of this subgenus is characterized by ± 32 columns of exothecial cells on the capsule periphery, a scariosus-type of peristome (though anomalous peristomes frequently occur) and by, though this was not mentioned by Pursell & BruggemanNannenga (2004), long rostrate opercula (versus shortly and bluntly rostrate in subg. Fissidens). It is interesting to note that anomalous peristomes are frequently found in corticolous species, e.g. in the Indian F. macrosporus Mitt., the Japanese F.neomagofukui Z.Iwats. & Tad.Suzuki, the pantropical F. lagenarius Mitt. and F.gardneri Mitt. and the African species F. macroglossus (Broth.) Brugg. - Nann. and F. cyatheicola Brugg. -Nann.

Published as part of Bruggeman-Nannenga, Maria A. & Müller, Frank, 2020, A contribution to the Fissidens Hedw. (Musci, Fissidentaceae) of Myanmar, including F. strictidens sp. nov. and F. pseudoanomalus sp. nov., pp. 229-238 in Cryptogamie, Bryologie 20 (18) on pages 230-233, DOI: 10.5252/cryptogamie-bryologie2020v41a18, http://zenodo.org/record/7822194

Related Organizations
Keywords

Fissidens strictidens, Fissidentales, Fissidens, Fissidentaceae, Biodiversity, Bryophyta, Plantae, Bryopsida, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green