Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Achieving the Paris Agreement 1.5°C target requires a reversal of the growing atmospheric concentrations of methane, which is about 80 times more potent than CO2 on a 20-year timescale. The IPCC 6th Assessment Report stated that methane is underregulated but little is known about the effectiveness of existing methane policies. In this Review, we systematically examine existing methane policies across the energy, waste and agriculture sectors. We find that currently only about 13% of methane emissions is covered by methane mitigation policies. Moreover, the effectiveness of these policies is far from clear mainly because methane emissions are largely calculated using potentially unrepresentative estimates instead of direct measurements. Coverage and stringency are two major blind spots in global methane policies. These findings suggest that significant and underexplored mitigation opportunities exist but unlocking them requires policymakers to identify a consistent approach for accurate quantification of methane emissions sources alongside greater policy stringency.
Measurement, reporting and verification, methane emissions, climate policies, waste, methane regulation, energy, agriculture
Measurement, reporting and verification, methane emissions, climate policies, waste, methane regulation, energy, agriculture
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts