Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

VFSMOD Input Definitions, Literature References and Sensitivity Analyses for Evaluating Vegetative Filter Strips in Pesticide Risk Assessment

Authors: Ritter, Amy; Muñoz-Carpena, Rafael; Chen, H.; Tang, J.; Westgate, J.; Henry, E.; Wente, S.; +6 Authors

VFSMOD Input Definitions, Literature References and Sensitivity Analyses for Evaluating Vegetative Filter Strips in Pesticide Risk Assessment

Abstract

In Canada and the U.S., aquatic exposure to pesticides is modeled using field and waterbody models linked together using the Pesticide in Water Calculator (PWC v. 2.001) . The field model is the Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM v. 5) (USEPA 2020). The waterbody model is the Variable Volume Waterbody Model (VVWM v. 1.02) (USEPA 2019). Currently, US and Canadian pesticide regulatory agencies do not have the ability to quantitatively model potential pesticide runoff reductions from vegetative filter strips (VFS), an area of non-crop (typically grass) vegetation designed to remove sediment and other pollutants from surface water runoff. In 2018, North Carolina State University’s Center of Excellence for Regulatory Science in Agriculture (CERSA) held a workshop, “Incorporating the benefits of vegetative filter strips into risk assessment and risk management of pesticides.” The workshop was organized by scientists from academia, government, and industry along with conservation experts and producers interested in evaluating VFS for reducing pesticide transport. A second workshop was held in September of 2020 where the mechanistic Vegetative Filter Strips Model (VFSMOD) was recommended in combination with PWC for quantitative mitigation of pesticides with VFS in current high-tier, long-term risk assessments. This document on input parameter definitions, literature references, and sensitivity analyses of the parameters used in VFSMOD is the result of the discussions following the second workshop for reference in the application of the model.

Keywords

vegetation buffers, risk assessment, runoff, PRZM, pesticides, mitigation, grass buffers, VFSMOD, vegetative filter strips, PWC, VFS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 205
    download downloads 161
  • 205
    views
    161
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
205
161
Green