Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

POLDER best practice guide to implementing schema.org for data discovery

Authors: Bricher, Pip; Verhey, Chantelle; Duerr, Ruth; Ingram, Rebekah; Pulsifer, Peter; Collins, Julia; Jones, Matthew; +15 Authors

POLDER best practice guide to implementing schema.org for data discovery

Abstract

This document aims to utilize schema.org for the Polar data management community. The community has agreed on and plans on implementing uniform best practices for documenting data, observing assets, and other entities. Extensive work has been conducted under both the Earth Science Information Partnership Science-on-schema.org group and the Research Data Alliance to develop approaches and guidelines for interoperable metadata practices. While the current Science-on-schema.org guidelines provide a strong technical basis for harmonised use of the schema.org vocabulary, they do not make specific requirements for minimal acceptable metadata nor for specific types of metadata requirements for key polar research use cases. This document assembles data discovery use cases and requirements for polar data discovery that represent a target set of features for the POLDER federated search system. Use cases specifically elucidate and prioritise the functional uses of the federated data discovery platform, which will in turn be used to articulate a specific list of metadata requirements needed to implement a discovery system that provides those features.

This document was a collaboration of international organizations working in the POLDER working group (https://polder.info/). The majority of writing sessions to complete this task was completed at the bimonthly Polar to Global Hackathon Sessions, meeting notes and recording can be found at https://p2g-data.org/workshops

Keywords

Arctic Data Committee, Controlled vocabulary development, Best practices, guide, Southern Ocean Observing System (SOOS), metadata, harvesting, schema.org, Metadata management, Data aggregation, Semantics, Best Practices, data, Metadata discovery, Harvesting, Data repository, POLDER, Cross-discipline, Data interoperability development, discovery, Schema.org

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 113
    download downloads 101
  • 113
    views
    101
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
113
101
Green