Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

ELABORATION OF THE ITALIAN PORTION OF THE GLOBAL SOIL ORGANIC CARBON MAP (GSOCMAP)

Authors: Maria Fantappiè; Costanza Calzolari; Fabrizio Ungaro; Ialina Vinci; Paolo Giandon; Adele Muscolo; Claudio Zaccone; +21 Authors

ELABORATION OF THE ITALIAN PORTION OF THE GLOBAL SOIL ORGANIC CARBON MAP (GSOCMAP)

Abstract

The Global Soil Organic Carbon map (GSOCmap) published by the Food and Agriculture Organization constitutes a baseline estimation of soil organic carbon stock (CS, ton ha–1) from 0 to 30 cm, on a grid at 30 arc-seconds resolution (approximately 1 x 1 km). It has been produced for the Italian territory by the Italian Soil Partnership (ISP): a national hub of institutions dealing with soils, either academic/research institutions, and regional soil services (RSS). The RSS are the main soil data owners in Italy and play a central role in the elaboration of policies for soil management. The RSS adhering to the ISP are: Calabria, Campania, Emilia Romagna, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Liguria, Lombardia, Marche, Piemonte, Puglia, Sicilia, Toscana, and Veneto. A national soil database is maintained by the Consiglio per la Ricerca e l'Analisi dell'Economia Agraria (CREA). The RSS contributed with soil data, with mean density of 1 point per 50 square kilometres, selecting data analysed for soil organic carbon content (SOC, dag kg-1), which were representative and well distributed for the following environmental covariates: land use, geomorphology, and climate. The data were selected inbetween 1990 al 2013. This was necessary in order to exclude the effect of the new soil protection policies of the Rural Development Programme 2014-2020. For the RSS not included in the ISP, the data were selected from the national soil database. 6748 point data were finally selected. SOC values obtained with the Springer and Klee and flash combustion elemental analyser methods were retained for elaborations, because the 2 methods, were found to give statistically equivalent results. SOC values obtained with Walkey and Black method were, instead, corrected with an empirical factor of 1.3. 2292 of the 6748 point data had also measured bulk density (BD, Mg m–3). Pedotransfer functions were calibrated to estimate BD were measured BD were missing, with the following as auxiliary variables: land use, soil regions, texture, and SOC. The carbon stock (CS, ton ha–1) was calculated by multiplying: 0.3 (m) * SOC (dag kg-1) * fine earth fraction (1 - skeletal content expressed as daL m–3) * BD (Mg m–3). CS of the first 30 cm depth was calculated as depth-weighted average. A spatial statistics method was used for the CS interpolation. The following auxiliary variables were used: soil regions, soil subregions, Corine land cover 2006, lithology, soils affected by natural constrains (gleyic, histic, vertic, coarse, shallow, arenic, sodic, and acid), sand content, silt content, 30-m aster-DEM, distance from coast, distance from relieves, soil aridity index, annual mean precipitations, mean annual air temperature, soil inorganic carbon, and soil depth. For the soil region of Po valley, the land units at 1:250,000 scale were also used. The interpolation method was a general linear regression for the soil regions of Po valley, and a radial basis function for the remaining Italian territory. The 6748 point data were divided, by spatial random sampling, into 10 subsets. Ten interpolations were produced, each time leaving out 1/10 of the dataset. Average (fig. 1), standard deviation and confidence intervals of these 10 interpolations were calculated. Mean Absolute Errors (MAE) and Root Mean Squared Errors (RMSE) were respectively 25.5 and 36.4 Mg/ha. A.85 Italy Map source: Country submission Point data Number of samples: 6748 Sampling period: 1990-2013 SOC analysis method: SOC values obtained with the Springer and Klee and ’flash combustion elemental analyser’ methods were retained for elaborations. Uncorrected values obtained by the Walkey and Black method were corrected with an empirical linear equation, based on previous studies and as recommended by the Italian official methods. BD analysis method: Undisturbed sampling, core method and pit method Mapping method Mapping method details: Neural Networks and GLM, according to soil region Validation statistics: Mean Error (ME) of the prediction is 1.688 Mg/ha, MAE 25.57 Mg/ha, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) is 36.24 Mg/ha. Contact Data Holder: Research centre for agriculture and environment Contact: CREA Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria edoardo.costantini@crea.gov.it

c_stock: mean value c_stock_cv: coefficient of variation c_stock_sd: standard deviation c_stock_se: standard error c_stock_minus: lower bound of the confidence interval c_stock_plus: upper limit of the confidence interval

Country
Italy
Keywords

http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C3841, carbon sequestration, common agricultural policy, digital soil mapping, land degradation neutrality, national soil hub, sustainable development goals, national soil hub, sustainable development goals, carbon sequestration, common agricultural policy, https://www.geonames.org/countries/IT/italy.html, digital soil mapping, https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/theme/so, land degradation neutrality, https://lod.nal.usda.gov/nalt/67854

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 50
    download downloads 52
  • 50
    views
    52
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
50
52