Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Caleidoscopsis undefined-1

Authors: Do Nascimento, Priscila S.; Serejo, Cristiana S.;

Caleidoscopsis undefined-1

Abstract

Identification key for World Caleidoscopsis species 1. Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral angle with a tooth; urosomite 1 with 1 dorsal tooth, small or long..................... 2 - Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral angle rounded, without a tooth; urosomite 1 with 2 small dorsal teeth, not reaching half-length of the urosomite 2..................................................... Caleidoscopsis tikal (J.L. Barnard, 1967) 2. Coxa 5 subtriangular, as long as wide; epimeral plate 3, posteroventral angle with moderate tooth, not exceeding end of urosomite 1.......................................................................................... 3 - Coxa 5 subrectangular, longer than wide; epimeral plate 3, posteroventral angle with a well-developed tooth, exceeding end of urosomite 1................................................... Caleidoscopsis simplignathia (J.L. Barnard, 1962) 3. Urosomite 1 not covering urosomite 2, with 1 small dorsal tooth; urosomite 2 with 1 small dorsal tooth, not exceeding halflength of urosomite 3.................................................................................. 4 - Urosomite 1 covering part of urosomite 2, with 1 long dorsal tooth; urosomite 2 with 1 very long dorsal tooth almost reaching the end of urosomite 3....................................................... Caleidoscopsis karamani sp. nov. 4. Antennae 1–2 flagellum with short articles, as long as wide; pereopod 7, basis 1.5x longer than wide; uropod 3, outer ramus with long article 2, about 40% of total length of ramus........................................................ 5 - Antennae 1–2 flagellum with long articles, at least 2x longer than wide; pereopod 7 basis thinner, 2x longer than wide; uropod 3, outer ramus with short article 2, about 25% of total length of the ramus......... Caleidoscopsis inermis (Ledoyer, 1986) 5. Antenna 1 simple, not geniculate; maxilliped palp, article 4 longer than 3; pereopods 5–7, propodus longer than dactylus...................................................................... Caleidoscopsis copal (J.L. Barnard, 1967) - Antenna 1 geniculate, folded up; maxilliped palp article 4 shorter than 3; pereopods 5–7, propodus shorter than dactylus............................................................................... Caleidoscopsis carlosi sp. nov.

Published as part of Do Nascimento, Priscila S. & Serejo, Cristiana S., 2023, New findings of the family Pardaliscidae from the deep-sea southwestern Atlantic the genus Caleidoscopsis Karaman, 1974, pp. 139-157 in Zootaxa 5256 (2) on page 156, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5256.2.3, http://zenodo.org/record/7745475

Keywords

Caleidoscopsis, Arthropoda, Pardaliscidae, Animalia, Amphipoda, Biodiversity, Malacostraca, Caleidoscopsis undefined-1, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
  • 3
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
Related to Research communities