Downloads provided by UsageCounts
We propose a new strategy for anomaly detection at the LHC based on unsupervised quantum machine learning algorithms. To accommodate the constraints on the problem size dictated by the limitations of current quantum hardware we develop a classical convolutional autoencoder. The designed quantum anomaly detection models, namely an unsupervised kernel machine and two clustering algorithms, are trained to find new-physics events in the latent representation of LHC data produced by the autoencoder. The performance of the quantum algorithms is benchmarked against classical counterparts on different new-physics scenarios and its dependence on the dimensionality of the latent space and the size of the training dataset is studied. For kernel-based anomaly detection, we identify a regime where the quantum model significantly outperforms its classical counterpart. An instance of the kernel machine is implemented on a quantum computer to verify its suitability for available hardware. We demonstrate that the observed consistent performance advantage is related to the inherent quantum properties of the circuit used.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Quantum Physics, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Physics, QC1-999, Quantum physics, Experimental particle physics; Phenomenology; Quantum physics, FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics, High Energy Physics - Experiment, Machine Learning (cs.LG), QB460-466, High Energy Physics - Experiment (hep-ex), Phenomenology, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), Experimental particle physics
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Quantum Physics, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Physics, QC1-999, Quantum physics, Experimental particle physics; Phenomenology; Quantum physics, FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics, High Energy Physics - Experiment, Machine Learning (cs.LG), QB460-466, High Energy Physics - Experiment (hep-ex), Phenomenology, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), Experimental particle physics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 14 | |
| downloads | 15 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts