Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Conference object . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

FAIR Assessment Tools Overview

Authors: Lang, Kevin; Assmann, Cora; Neute, Nadine; Gerlach, Roman; Rex, Jessica;

FAIR Assessment Tools Overview

Abstract

English: This overview presents a selection of FAIR assessment tools. The categories also use the acronym FAIR but stand for: Fully Configurable Tools, Automatic Tools, Improved Survey Tools and Regular List Tools. The classification of tools into these categories is not always 100% clear, especially when certain properties overlap. In preparation for the poster, an evaluation of all known FAIR assessment tools was carried out between July 2022 and February 2023. Each tool was evaluated by three independent people. The categories used included the time taken to carry out the FAIR assessment, the presence of feedback and the required prior knowledge. With regard to the technical specifics, the research revealed that only generic tools are currently on offer. The poster was created for the "3. Sächsische FDM-Tagung" and the "E-Science-Tage 2023". Following tools weren't evaluated: FAIRdat (unfinished, beta version of SATISFYD?) FAIR-Aware (awarenness, not evaluation questions for dataset) Files: Poster as PDF Data as XLSX (full table) or CSV (split in data and codebook file) ------------------------------------------- German: Diese Übersicht stellt eine Auswahl von FAIR Assessment Tools vor. Die verwendeten Kategorien nutzen ebenfalls das Akronym FAIR stehen hier aber für: Fully Configurable Tools, Automatic Tools, Improved Survey Tools und Regular List Tools. Die Einordnung der Werkzeuge in diese Kategorien ist nicht immer hundertprozentig eindeutig, besonders, wenn sich bestimmte Eigenschaften überschneiden. In der Vorbereitung des Posters wurde zwischen Juli 2022 und Februar 2023 eine Auswertung aller bekannten FAIR Assessment Tools vorgenommen. Jedes Werkzeug wurde von drei unabhängigen Personen bewertet. Die verwendeten Kategorien waren unter anderem die Zeit zur Durchführung des FAIR Assessments, das Vorhandensein von Feedback und die vorausgesetzten Kenntnisse. In Bezug auf die Fachspezifik ergab die Recherche, dass zurzeit ausschließlich generische Werkzeuge angeboten werden. Das Poster wurde für die Veranstaltung "3. Sächsische FDM-Tagung" und die " E-Science-Tage 2023 "erstellt. Folgende Werkzeuge wurden nicht evaluiert: FAIRdat (unfertig, beta-Version von SATISFYD?) FAIR-Aware (Bewusstseinsfragen, nicht für Datensatz) Dateien: Poster als PDF Datensatz als XLSX (ganze Tabelle) oder CSV (aufgespalten in Daten und Codebuch)

added "CSIRO 5-star Data Rating tool" and "FAIR Enough" tool to evaluation

Keywords

evaluation, list, overview, dataset, fair assessment tools, fair, fair assessment, poster

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 252
    download downloads 388
  • 252
    views
    388
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
252
388
Green