Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2021
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2021
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Geographic quantile regression forest: a new method for spatial modelling of mineral commodities

Authors: Maxwell, Kane; Rajabi, Mojtaba; Esterle, Joan;

Geographic quantile regression forest: a new method for spatial modelling of mineral commodities

Abstract

Spatial modelling of analysis results such as grade, geochemical properties and density is required for resource estimation in almost all commodities. For spatial modelling of most commodity properties, geostatistical methods are the most popular because they are usually more accurate than deterministic methods, can quantify uncertainty and can use auxiliary information to improve predictive accuracy. However, geostatistical methods have the primary disadvantages that they have onerous preprocessing steps such as variogram modelling, rely on rigid statistical assumptions, and incorporation of numerous auxiliary variables which have non-linear relationship with the target variable is difficult. To address these disadvantages, a machine learning method based on quantile regression forest algorithm is proposed as an alternative approach for spatial modelling. This newly proposed method (termed geographic quantile regression forest) does not require variogram modelling, can quantify uncertainty and can easily incorporate numerous auxiliary information of differing data type. To evaluate the performance of the new method, the accuracy of predictions of coal relative density is compared to inverse distance weighting and regression kriging. Data from an active mine site in the Bowen Basin, Queensland Australia is used for the comparison. Using evaluation metrics from leave-one-out cross-validation, this paper demonstrates that the geographic quantile regression forest method has higher accuracy than inverse distance weighting and similar or higher accuracy than regression kriging accuracy across all geological domains. The high accuracy, similar performance to regression kriging and stated advantages over geostatistical methods makes it a candidate for future inclusion in geological model packages.

Open-Access Online Publication: March 01, 2023

Keywords

quantile regression forest, Spatial modelling, geostatistics, machine learning.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 9
    download downloads 11
  • 9
    views
    11
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
9
11
Green
Related to Research communities