Downloads provided by UsageCounts
We describe a formal correctness proof of RANKING, an online algorithm for online bipartite matching. An outcome of our formalisation is that it shows that there is a gap in all combinatorial proofs of the algorithm. Filling that gap constituted the majority of the effort which went into this work. This is despite the algorithm being one of the most studied algorithms and a central result in theoretical computer science. This gap is an example of difficulties in formalising graphical arguments which are ubiquitous in the theory of computing.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Formalized Mathematics, Matching Theory, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, Online Algorithms, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS), 004, Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Formalized Mathematics, Matching Theory, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, Online Algorithms, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS), 004, Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
| citations The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest. | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 29 | |
| downloads | 24 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts