Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Acanthogorgia spinosa Hiles 1899

Authors: Ramvilas, Ghosh; Alderslade, Philip; Ranjeet, Kutty;

Acanthogorgia spinosa Hiles 1899

Abstract

Acanthogorgia spinosa Hiles, 1899 Acanthogorgia spinosa Hiles, 1899: 198, pl. 22f, fig. 3–6 (New Britain, SE Guinea) Opinion: There is no evidence that this species occurs in the region. Justification: These Indian records seem to be either invalid or unconfirmable: Thomson & Simpson 1909: 192–194 (Andamans; Coromandel coast; Gopalpur; Kanyakumari; Malabar coast); Kumar et al. 2014a: 52, pl. 23, fig. A–D (Havelock, Munak Gate); Fernando et al. 2017: 55, pl. 21, fig. A–E (Havelock, Munak Gate). Literature analysis: This species was erected by Hiles for material collected off New Britain. The account included drawings of a few sclerites that could have come from a number of different species of the genus, and the holotype has never been redescribed so the exact details of the sclerites are unknown and the species is not recognisable. In Thomson & Simpson’s (1909) account of Acanthogorgia muricata Verrill, 1883, the authors claimed that Acanthogorgia spinosa was a synonym, but that A. muricata, which is also unrecognisable, only occurs in the West Indies. The accounts given by Kumar et al. (2014a) and Fernando et al. (2017) are identical, but the closeup image of the polyps clearly shows their material has polyps that have no crown spines and are very similar to those illustrated in their account of A. breviflora. These traits indicate the material would probably be a species of Muricella or perhaps Anthogorgia, but the illustrated sclerites look more like those found in Acanthogorgia, in some species of which the crown spines are absent or very reduced, for example: Acanthogorgia ildibaha, A. isoxya and A. augusta (all Grasshoff, 1999), and also see Fabricius & Alderslade (2001:184), but the polyps of the Indian material look quite different and its identity is uncertain. Regardless, Hiles figured a polyp in her original description and it had a distinct crown with many long projecting spines, and therefore quite different to the Indian specimens. Kumar et al. (2015) just lists the species and provides an illustration of the specimens in Kumar et al. (2014a) and Fernando et al. (2017).

Published as part of Ramvilas, Ghosh, Alderslade, Philip & Ranjeet, Kutty, 2023, The taxonomy of Indian gorgonians: an assessment of the descriptive records of gorgonians (Anthozoa: Octocorallia: Alcyonacea) recorded as occurring in the territorial waters of India, along with neighbouring regions and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, and the highlighting of perceived unethical practice, pp. 1-124 in Zootaxa 5236 (1) on pages 38-39, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5236.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/7639327

Keywords

Acanthogorgia spinosa, Cnidaria, Acanthogorgiidae, Animalia, Acanthogorgia, Biodiversity, Alcyonacea, Anthozoa, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
  • 3
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
Green