Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Data and materials from an experimental comparison of LiteStrat and iStar modelling methods. Data was collected from a quasi-experiment with 28 undergraduate subjects with a between-subjects design, considering two independent variables: the treatment (LiteStrat and i*) and a blocking variable (the problem). We assessed the accuracy and completeness of the produced models as well as the efficiency and satisfaction with the method of the subjects.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 8 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts