
Tchihatchewia Boiss. in Tchich., Asie Min., Bot. 1: 292. 1860. Tribe: Hesperideae Prantl. Notes. – RAUSCHERT (1982) claimed that Boissier’s name was published in 1866 and was predated by Tchihatchewia Unger, a fossil genus published in 1863. As indicated by AL-SHEHBAZ et al. (2007), STAFLEU & COWAN (1976) clearly demonstrated that Tchihatcheff ’s volume 1 of Asie Mineure botanical account was published in 1860. Therefore, Rauschert’s generic name Neotchihatchewia Rauschert as a replacement of Boissier’s name is illegitimate. Molecular phylogenetic studies by WARWICK et al. (2010) clearly show that the monospecific Tchihatchewia is nested within the earlier published Hesperis and, therefore, the two genera have recently been united (GERMAN & AL-SHEHBAZ, 2018).
Published as part of AL-Shehbaz, Ihsan A. & Barriera, Gabrielle, 2019, Typification of Edmond Boissier's Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) names enumerated in Flora Orientalis, pp. 1-193 in Boissiera 72 on page 111, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7630433
Tracheophyta, Magnoliopsida, Tchihatchewia, Brassicaceae, Biodiversity, Brassicales, Plantae, Taxonomy
Tracheophyta, Magnoliopsida, Tchihatchewia, Brassicaceae, Biodiversity, Brassicales, Plantae, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
