
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
{"references": ["Blei, D., Ng, A. & Jordan, M. (2003). Latent Dirichlet Allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research. 3. 601-608. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/944919.944937", "Chaney, A., & Blei, D. (2012). Visualizing Topic Models. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 6(1), 419-422. Retrieved from https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14321", "Daenekindt, S., & Huisman, J. (2020). Mapping the scattered field of research on higher education. A correlated topic model of 17,000 articles, 1991\u20132018. High Educ 80, 571\u2013587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00500-x", "Guthrie, S., Lichten, C.A., van Belle, J., Ball, S., Knack, A., & Hofman, J. (2017). Understanding mental health in the research environment: A Rapid Evidence Assessment. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2022.html", "Hazell, C.M., Chapman, L., Valeix, S.F. et al. (2020). Understanding the mental health of doctoral researchers: a mixed methods systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Syst Rev 9, 197. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01443-1", "Mattijssen, L., Bergmans, J. E., van der Weijden, I., & Teelken, J. C. (2021). In the eye of the storm: the mental health situation of PhD candidates. Perspectives on medical education, 10(2), 71\u201372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00639-4", "Miranda-Jim\u00e9nez, S., Gelbukh, A. & Sidorov, G. (2014). Conceptual Graphs as Framework for Summarizing Short Texts. International Journal of Conceptual Structures and Smart Applications. 2. 55-75. 10.4018/IJCSSA.2014070104.", "R\u00f6der, M., Both, A. & Hinneburg, A. (2015). Exploring the Space of Topic Coherence Measures. Proceedings of the eight International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Shanghai, February 2-6.", "Sabagh, Z., Hall, N.C., & Saroyan, A. (2018) Antecedents, correlates and consequences of faculty burnout, Educational Research, 60:2, 131-156, DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2018.1461573", "Salimzadeh R., Hall N.C., & Saroyan, A. (2021) Examining Academics' Strategies for Coping With Stress and Emotions: A Review of Research. Front. Educ. 6:660676. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.660676"]}
Studying mental health in academic environment is a complicated topic, which was for a long time underrepresented in literature (Gurtie et al., 2017). In recent years, research findings have been accumulated in the area (Mattijssen et al., 2021), and their number is growing. The findings were summarized in systematic reviews, such as Sabagh et al. (2018) on faculty burnout, Hazell et al. (2020) on mental health of doctoral researchers, or Salimyedeh et al. (2021) on coping with stress in academia. However, this traditional approach deals with rather limited samples of publications: for instance, 36 papers in Sabagh et al. (2018), 22 papers in Hazell et al. (2020), and 52 papers in Salimyedeh et al. (2021). In this study, we rely upon advanced machine learning techniques that make it possible to obtain a wider picture of the area on larger samples of literature. Our task is to illustrate how machine learning methods and human expertise complement each other in summarizing literature on mental health in academia.
This document is part of the Book of Abstracts of the ReMO 2022 Conference that was organized within the framework of COST Action CA19117 - "Researcher Mental Health".
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 15 | |
downloads | 12 |