Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Background:For most of the competitive exams, students have opted for online education rather than traditional modes of education. But very few studies are conducted on memory retention amongst students with traditional study methods and this newer study method. So, this research is aimed to compare the effectiveness of video modules and conventional text reading methods on medical students memory consolidation. Objectives:To compare the effectiveness of video lectures against reading materials in memory retention among medical students. Material & Methods:100 medical students after obtaining their consent were included and randomized into two comparable groups. The groups were given either a video or text-based learning module on the demographic cycle. A test was held immediately, consisting of ten multiple-choice. The test was repeated in the second and fourth week. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were utilized. The mean score difference between the video and control groups was determined using a two-tailed unpaired t-test. Also, to test whether there were differences in memory recall between the two genders, data were analyzed using unpaired t-test. Results:Participants from the video-based learning method had statistically significant higher marks compared to participants who underwent the text reading method. Female participants scored slightly higher in memory recall. Conclusion:Video-based learning method is more effective in medical students memory retention compared to the text reading method.
Memory Randomised Controlled Trial Video Text Medical Student
Memory Randomised Controlled Trial Video Text Medical Student
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 15 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts