Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Having an understanding of anatomy in many clinical applications facilitates its implementation. It is important to understand the extent to which self-efficacy and test anxiety influence students' performance in order to establish if the objectives of the anatomy course has been met. This study was conducted to compare the views of the students about the anatomy course and to evaluate the influence of self-efficacy level on test anxiety. This descriptive study includes 384 students studying at the Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Vocational School of Health Services during the 2021-2022 academic year. In this study; a questionnaire form, the Perception of Self-Efficacy Scale for Anatomy Class and the Test Anxiety Scale were used. According to the findings of the analyses, the students' willingness to choose the department of anatomy, self-efficacy levels and their outlooks towards the anatomy course according to their education level were found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). The self-efficacy perception levels of the students enrolled in the Faculty of Medicine were observed to be higher than those in the undergraduate group (p <0.05). Meanwhile, a statistically significant difference was found between students' test anxiety levels, gender, nationality, and willingness to choose the department (p<0.05). In general, a strong negative correlation exists between the self-efficacy of the students participating in the research and their test anxiety. The results of this study reflect the relationship between students' anatomy self-efficacy and test anxiety. In line with the forthcoming research on this subject, it is believed that making anatomy education more permanent will contribute to the future training of competent health workers and reduce levels of occupational anxiety.
Test Anxiety, Questionnaire, Self-Efficacy, Anatomy, Student
Test Anxiety, Questionnaire, Self-Efficacy, Anatomy, Student
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 19 | |
| downloads | 21 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts