Downloads provided by UsageCounts
ESOF 2016 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions satellite event "Research and society" 28-29 July 2016, Manchester, United Kingdom Session: Ethics, transparency, research integrity, misconduct: Where do I stand? Scandals of scientific plagiarism have made the headlines in the past few years. The collection and interpretation of data is also under scrutiny. Conducting science with good ethics, in a transparent manner is more important than ever. Have you (or your research group) adopted adequate measures to avoid mistakes? What can you do as a researcher to contribute to a healthy research environment?
{"references": ["Christoph Meier, How ETH deals with scientific misconduct: Research off the rails, https://archiv.ethlife.ethz.ch/e/articles/campuslife/faelschungendiek.html"]}
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts