Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Within Open Access publishing, processing is usually used to refer to the transformation of scholarly work into a product, as for example in the Book or Article Processing Charge. However, inspired by an attention to diverse forms of relationality in various traditions in the social sciences and humanities, including (but not limited) to process philosophy, this presentation explores the more varied potential of processing in open access publishing. Its particular focus is OA books, examining the way in which the soon to be launched Open Book Collective is an OA infrastructure that puts relations into play that extend far beyond the often increasingly tenuous relations that can connect a scholar to their academic products.
Community-led Open Publishing Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM) is supported by the Research England Development (RED) Fund, and Arcadia—a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin.
Open Book Collective, Open Access, alternative ecosystem, Community-led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM), books, publishing, not-for-profit
Open Book Collective, Open Access, alternative ecosystem, Community-led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM), books, publishing, not-for-profit
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts