
Eothenomys andersoni (Thomas, 1905). Abstr. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 23: 18. TYPE LOCALITY: Japan, N. Honshu, Iwate Ken, Tsunagi, near Morioka. DISTRIBUTION: Honshu (Japan). COMMENT: Formerly included in Aschizomys; includes niigatae, from C. Honshu, and imaizumii from S. Honshu; see Corbet, 1978: 100, and Aimi, 1980, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyoto Univ. Ser. Biol., 8: 35-84; both were considered distinct species by Ota and Jameson, 1961, Pacif. Sci., 15:594-604, and Imaizumi, 1960, Coloured Illustrations of the Mammals of Japan, 196 pp. Ota and Jameson, 1961, Ecology, 42: 184-186, Ota and Jameson, 1961, Pacif. Sci., 15:594-604, Gromov and Polyakov, 1977: 147, and Corbet, 1978: 100, placed andersoni in Clethrionomys.
{"references": ["Aimi, M. 1980. A revised classification of the Japanese red-backed voles. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyoto University, Series of Biology, 8: 35 - 84.", "Gromov, I. M., and I. Ya. Polyakov. 1977. Fauna SSSR, Mlekopitayushchie, tom 3, vyp. 8 [Fauna of the USSR, vol. 3, pt. 8, Mammals]. Polevki [Voles (Microtinae)]. Nauka, Moscow-Leningrad, 504 pp. (in Russian)."]}
Published as part of James H. Honacki, Kenneth E. Kinman & James W. Koeppl, 1982, Order Rodentia (Part 4), pp. 477-504 in Mammal Species of the World (1 st Edition), Lawrence, Kansas, USA :Alien Press, Inc. & The Association of Systematics Collections on pages 485-486, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7353034
Eothenomys andersoni, Mammalia, Eothenomys, Animalia, Rodentia, Biodiversity, Arvicolidae, Chordata, Taxonomy
Eothenomys andersoni, Mammalia, Eothenomys, Animalia, Rodentia, Biodiversity, Arvicolidae, Chordata, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
