Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Electrolysers towards EU MAWP 2023 targets and beyond

Authors: Andrenacci, Sara; Choi, Yejung; Raka, Yash; Talic, Belma; Colmenares-Rausseo, Luis;

Electrolysers towards EU MAWP 2023 targets and beyond

Abstract

The Fuel Cell and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking and its successor Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking set a series of key performance indicators (KPIs) that allows tracing the progress toward hydrogen production from renewable electricity coupled with water electrolysis. They are related to Energy consumption (KPI 1); Capital Expenditure (KPI 2); Efficiency Degradation (KPI 3); Flexibility (KPI 4); and Hot/Cold start (KPI 5). These 2023 KPIs are general technical goals settled to be fulfilled by all water electrolysis technologies. In that sense, the Clean Hydrogen JU settled for 2024, 2030, and beyond KPIs accordingly to each water electrolysis technology. Even though the KPIs are now adapted to each technology, the conditions assumed for each KPI are far to be a standard procedure on how it should be measured making it very difficult to do a direct comparison among technologies and between manufacturers. Despite that, these settings might be difficult to be reached with some of the available technologies due to their current inherent characteristics and especially for those less mature technologies. Nowadays, there is no specific electrolyser technology outperforming the rest across all the features essential for the effective production of renewable hydrogen. Nevertheless, currently, due to their maturity and despite their limitations, both AWE and PEMWE technologies will draw the main attention, although further R&D of AEMWE, SOEL, and PCCEL would bring those less mature technologies as alternative solutions in the future. In the end, innovation, and competition among these key technologies and their manufacturers, will lead to technological improvements and a better fit for different technologies and system designs on a case-by-case basis.

Keywords

AWE, Variable renewable energy, SOEL, Water electrolysis, PCCE, Key Performance Indicators, Electrolysers, PEMWE, AEMWE, Hydrogen

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 187
    download downloads 73
  • 187
    views
    73
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
187
73
Green