Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm9982 , 10.5281/zenodo.7097953 , 10.5281/zenodo.7097954 , 10.5281/zenodo.18178147 , 10.5281/zenodo.18178146
pmid: 36351024
pmc: PMC9645725
handle: 11336/200562
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm9982 , 10.5281/zenodo.7097953 , 10.5281/zenodo.7097954 , 10.5281/zenodo.18178147 , 10.5281/zenodo.18178146
pmid: 36351024
pmc: PMC9645725
handle: 11336/200562
Effective policies to halt biodiversity loss require knowing which anthropogenic drivers are the most important direct causes. Whereas previous knowledge has been limited in scope and rigor, here we statistically synthesize empirical comparisons of recent driver impacts found through a wide-ranging review. We show that land/sea use change has been the dominant direct driver of recent biodiversity loss worldwide. Direct exploitation of natural resources ranks second and pollution third; climate change and invasive alien species have been significantly less important than the top two drivers. The oceans, where direct exploitation and climate change dominate, have a different driver hierarchy from land and fresh water. It also varies among types of biodiversity indicators. For example, climate change is a more important driver of community composition change than of changes in species populations. Stopping global biodiversity loss requires policies and actions to tackle all the major drivers and their interactions, not some of them in isolation.
Earth, Environmental, Ecological, and Space Sciences, environment assessment, ANTHROPOGENIC DIRECT DRIVERS, invasive species, Chapter 3, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, BIODIVERSITY LOSS, POST-2020 GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY FRAMEWORK, IPBES, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, Alien Invasive Species Assessment AIS, biodiversity
Earth, Environmental, Ecological, and Space Sciences, environment assessment, ANTHROPOGENIC DIRECT DRIVERS, invasive species, Chapter 3, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, BIODIVERSITY LOSS, POST-2020 GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY FRAMEWORK, IPBES, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, Alien Invasive Species Assessment AIS, biodiversity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 764 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% |
| views | 54 | |
| downloads | 188 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts