Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This study investigates questions about personal names, i.e. questions correspond- ing to What’s your name? in English. This potentially universal type of question is referred to as the personal name question (PNQ). The study sketches the typological variation found in the PNQ from a cross-linguistic perspective and analyzes the synchronic typology and diachronic development of the PNQ in Tungusic, a small but important language family spoken in Northeast Asia. Cross-linguistically, two main types of PNQs are attested. Type A is an equational copula sentence (e.g., What is your name?) while Type B contains a speech act verb (e.g., What are you called?). Tungusic shows a tendency for Type A but, because of contact languages such as Mongolian and Russian, also has instances of Type B. One of several other dimensions of variation among the world’s languages is the kind of interrogative used in PNQs. Tungusic languages originally used an interrogative meaning ‘who’ (literally Who is your name?). The use of ‘what’ in several languages located in the south and of ‘how’ in many languages in the north can be attributed to influence from Chinese, Russian, and other languages. Historical accounts of Tungusic are usually restricted to individual items (e.g., *si ‘you (sg)’ *gärbü ‘name’, *ŋüi ‘who’, e.g. Benzing 1956), but rarely are larger expressions reconstructed to Proto-Tungusic. This study shows that the Proto-Tungusic PNQ as one idiom can be plausibly reconstructed as *si(n-i) gärbü-si ŋüi? ‘2sg(.obl-gen) name-2sg.poss who’. Most deviations in modern languages can be explained by contact with surrounding languages.
reconstruction, frames, personal name question, typology, construction grammar, Tungusic
reconstruction, frames, personal name question, typology, construction grammar, Tungusic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 140 | |
| downloads | 58 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts