Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Survey on the situation of professors at a technical university in Germany. Questionnaire (English version)

Authors: Geisler, Helena; Löther, Andrea; Steinweg, Nina;

Survey on the situation of professors at a technical university in Germany. Questionnaire (English version)

Abstract

This English questionnaire is based on the German version (Geisler et al. 2022). The German version was constructed by CEWS (GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Center of Excellence Women and Science) for the online survey in the context of the study to evaluate the current situation of women professors at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT). The main focus of the online survey of all professors at KIT was the evaluation of the experienced work situation and working atmosphere. For this purpose, the general conditions of the professorship were surveyed, in particular the resources available, appointment/tenure negotiations and time allocation. On the other hand, the survey asked about satisfaction with the work situation, sources of stress and energy, and the experienced working atmosphere, in particular about experienced recognition, preferential treatment and discrimination. In this document, the questions of the English questionnaire are supplemented by the notes on programming and coding and by references to similar (German and English) questions from other surveys in the field of higher education and science research.

{"references": ["German Questionnaire: Geisler, Helena, L\u00f6ther, Andrea, & Steinweg, Nina. (2022). Umfrage zur Situation von Professor*innen an einer technischen Hochschule in Deutschland. Fragebogen (deutsche Version). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7023258"]}

Questionnaire Work situation Working atmosphere University Professors

Keywords

Gender inequality, Questionnaire, Geschlechterungleichheiten, Hochschule, Climate survey, Fragebogen, Befragung, Gleichstellung, Gender Equality, Higher Education, Working atmosphere, Arbeitsatmosphäre, Diskriminierung, Arbeits- und Organisationsklima, Discrimination, Arbeitssituation, Work situation, Survey

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 62
    download downloads 10
  • 62
    views
    10
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
62
10
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs: