<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Under gametophytic self-incompatibility (GSI), plants are heterozygous at the self-incompatibility locus (S-locus) and can only be fertilized by pollen with a different allele at that locus. The last century has seen a heated debate about the correct way of modeling allele diversity in a GSI population that was never formally resolved. Starting from an individual-based model, we derive the deterministic dynamics as proposed by Fisher (1958), and compute the stationary S-allele frequency distribution. We find that the stationary distribution proposed by Wright (1964) is close to our theoretical prediction, in line with earlier numerical confirmation. Additionally, we approximate the invasion probability of a new S-allele, which scales inversely with the number of resident S-alleles. Lastly, we use the stationary allele frequency distribution to estimate the population size of a plant population from an empirically obtained allele frequency spectrum, which complements the existing estimator of the number of S-alleles. Our expression of the stationary distribution resolves the long-standing debate about the correct approximation of the number of S-alleles and paves the way for new statistical developments for the estimation of the plant population size based on S-allele frequencies.
Codes and datasets for generating the figures in the main text and the Supplementary Information of the manuscript entitled "Revisiting the number of self-incompatibility alleles: from old models to new results" published in the Journal of Evolutionary Biology (https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14061). Version Update June 2024: There was a small mistake in the code that has been corrected now. The published figures had to be corrected, which can be found here: doi:10.1093/jeb/voae059/7685015.
Generally, the code is structured per figure in the manuscript, i.e., all code to reproduce Figure X in the manuscript is contained in the folder labeled "FigureX". However, data and processing files need to be downloaded separately. Then the data needs to be copied into the respective folders of the software to run the codes. I am sorry for this complication, I do not like it either.
invasion probability, gametophytic self incompatibility, allele frequency distribution, diffusion approximation, diversification rate, parameter estimation, stochastic model
invasion probability, gametophytic self incompatibility, allele frequency distribution, diffusion approximation, diversification rate, parameter estimation, stochastic model
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |