Downloads provided by UsageCounts
With the Open Science movement, the patterns of data sharing are evolving. In this context, the French Center for socio-political data (CDSP) undertook an experimental project - UpMet (Upscaling metadata for increasing reuse in the social sciences) - that aimed to build a question bank using DDI-Lifecycle and Colectica - Designer, Repository and Portal. Aside from compliance with the CESSDA repositories standards, so that data and metadata may be harvested in the European Question Bank, this new tool was implemented for two additional purposes. On the one hand, to make data more discoverable and findable at the variable level. On the other hand, to pave the way for a time-efficient internal documentation protocol relying on a metadata model at the variable level – a reference document where data managers may find data organization paradigms. Firstly, we’ll outline the main implementation steps of DDI-Lifecycle using the Colectica software packages, including challenges met to build the question bank. Then, we’ll demonstrate the benefits in terms of data discoverability and reusability from users’ perspective. After reviewing internal and external outcomes, we aim to discuss opportunities of implementing Colectica in the overall ecosystem of research data dissemination at the CDSP. More broadly, the presentation will share feedback about the entry cost of upgrading data documentation standards (from DDI-Codebook to DDI-Lifecycle), as well as the process of enhancing metadata documentation quality, especially harmonization of items and work on variable-level granularity.
Metadata, DDI-Lifecycle, UpMet, Colectica, [SHS.SCIPO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science, [SHS.INFO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences
Metadata, DDI-Lifecycle, UpMet, Colectica, [SHS.SCIPO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science, [SHS.INFO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 8 | |
| downloads | 10 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts