Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

D4.5 ARETE Use Scenarios: Analysis of Educational Technologies Usage in Situ – UPDATE

Authors: ARETE;

D4.5 ARETE Use Scenarios: Analysis of Educational Technologies Usage in Situ – UPDATE

Abstract

This deliverable D4.5 reports the evaluation methods and results that WP4 has implemented and obtained since the submission of D4.2 in M18. In close collaborations with WP3, WP5 and WP6, the HCI team of WP4 endeavoured to provide timely feedback to the respective teams for improving the interaction quality of the design artefacts generated for the four Pilots. Utilising the established human-centred design methods, we have identified usability problems (UPs). For each UP, we assigned an importance level (low, medium, high) for it to be fixed and proposed recommended modifications for the development team to consider. The table below presents an overview of the evaluation studies undertaken. The design artefacts for each Pilot were at different development stages when under evaluation. The number of usability problems (UPs) varied with the complexity of the software package involved. Specifically, the Pilot 2 package comprised five components - two interactive apps, two workbooks and one map – accounting for a higher number of UPs, albeit the majority was of low importance. Encouragingly, the revised versions of the design artefacts evaluated were found to be more usable and pleasurable to use. Furthermore, WP4 explored the innovative approaches to evaluating eXtended Reality (XR) applications with the wider research community. A workshop was held where emergent XR devices (e.g., smart glasses) and innovative methods (e.g., multisensory fusion) were explored.

This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 856533.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 43
    download downloads 20
  • 43
    views
    20
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
43
20
Green
Funded by
Related to Research communities