Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Lebbeus fujimotoi Matsuzaki, Hibino & Komai 2015

Authors: Komai, Tomoyuki; Matsuzaki, Koji;

Lebbeus fujimotoi Matsuzaki, Hibino & Komai 2015

Abstract

Lebbeus fujimotoi Matsuzaki, Hibino & Komai, 2015 (Fig. 13, 14) Lebbeus fujimotoi Matsuzaki, Hibino & Komai, 2015: 311, figs. 2–5. Material examined. CBM-ZC 16702, 1 male (cl 19.6 mm), Nemuro Strait, off Rausu, 26 August 2015, commercial trap for pandalids, coll. K. Matsuzaki, DNA voucher; CBM-ZC 16703, 1 ovigerous female (cl 23.2 mm), Nemuro Strait, off Rausu, 44°01.17’N, 145°22.50’E, 660–870 m, 7 July 2017, commercial trap, coll. K. Matsuzaki; CBM-ZC 16704, 1 ovigerous female (cl 23.8 mm), same data, DNA voucher; CBM-ZC 16705, 1 ovigerous female (cl 24.0 mm), same data; CBM-ZC 16706, 1 ovigerous female (cl 25.5 mm), same data. Remarks. The present male specimen (CBM-ZC 16702) differs from the type series of Lebbeus fujimotoi in the slender, slightly sinuous rostrum with six dorsal (the anteriormost tooth is located at the midlength) and nine ventral teeth and the possession of an epipod on the pereopod 1. In the type specimens of L. fujimotoi, consisting of four females and one male, the rostrum is noticeably curved dorsally, with four dorsal and seven or eight ventral teeth; the anteriormost tooth of the dorsal rostral series is located at the proximal 0.2–0.3; the pereopod 1 is devoid of epipod (Matsuzaki et al. 2015). Nevertheless, the COI sequence of the male specimen is almost identical (K2P divergence 0.3%; Table 3) with that of one of the ovigerous female specimen (CBM-ZC 16704), which closely agrees with the type series in morphological aspects. Consequently, the male specimen is referred to L. fujimotoi. This finding indicates that the development of epipod on the pereopod 1 is variable in L. fujimotoi. Similar variation in the development of the epipod on the pereopod 1 is also known in L. elegans, the another species normally lacking epipod on the pereopod 1 (Komai et al. 2004). Genetic divergences between L. fujimotoi and other known congeneric species are 3.3–24.9% (COI) (Table 3) and 1.1–6.8% (16S) (Table 4).

Published as part of Komai, Tomoyuki & Matsuzaki, Koji, 2022, Three new species of the thorid shrimp genus Lebbeus White, 1847 (Decapoda: Caridea) from Nemuro Strait, Hokkaido, Japan, with supplemental note on L. fujimotoi Matsuzaki, Hibino & Komai, 2015, pp. 151-181 in Zootaxa 5133 (2) on page 174, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/6521560

Keywords

Lebbeus fujimotoi, Thoridae, Arthropoda, Decapoda, Animalia, Lebbeus, Biodiversity, Malacostraca, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 5
  • 5
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
5
Green
Related to Research communities