Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Academic dishonesty cheating in synchronous and asynchronous classes: A proctored examination intervention

Authors: Homer T. Alvarez; Reynald S. Dayrit; Maria Crisella A. Dela Cruz; Clariza C. Jocson; Renzo T. Mendoza; Ariel V. Reyes; Joyce Niña N. Salas;

Academic dishonesty cheating in synchronous and asynchronous classes: A proctored examination intervention

Abstract

{"references": ["Abbas, A. & Naeemi, Z. (2011). Cheating Behavior among Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(3). http://www.ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol._2_No._3_[Special_Issue_-_January_2011]/30.pdf", "Armstead, P.K. (2001).What Factors Affect Cheating in Secondary School and Why? https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/1840", "Aviv, A.J., Balash, D.G., Fainchtein, R.A., Kim, D., Shaibekova, D. & Sherr, M. (2020). Examining the Examiners: Students' Privacy and Security Perceptions of Online Proctoring Services. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.05917", "Bachore, M.M. (2016). The Nature, Causes and Practices of Academic Dishonesty/Cheating in Higher \tEducation: The Case of Hawassa University. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1109249", "Bonk, R.J., et al. (2020). Pedagogy in the Time of Pandemic: From Localisation to Glocalisation. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10101902/", "Bretag, T., Ellis, C., Haerengin, K., Harper, R., Mcbride, S. & Zucker, I. (2018). Does authentic \tassessment assure academic integrity? Evidence from contract cheating data. Higher Education Research and Development, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1680956", "Bui, T.A., Nguyen, N.H. ., Tran, T.T.T. & Nguyen, A.N.P. (2021). Online Tests in the Trend of Education 4.0: An Empirical Study in Mathematics at High Schools of Can Tho City. Vietnam Journal \tof Education, 5(1), 24\u201332. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2021.29", "Chen, B., West, M. & Zilles, C. (2017). Do Performance Trends Suggest Wide-spread Collaborative Cheating on Asynchronous Exams? https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3051457.3051465", "Chen, N.S. & Ko, L. (2010). An Online Synchronous Test for Professional Interpreters. Educational Technology & Society, 13 (2),153-165. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.13.2.153", "Dendir, S. & Maxwell, R. (2020). Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958820300336", "Diego, L.A., (2017). Friends with Benefits: Causes and Effects of Learners 'Cheating Practices During Examination. IAFOR Journal of Education, 5(2), 126-133. http://iafor.org/archives/journals/iafor-journal-of-education/10.22492.ije.5.2.06.pdf", "Dulay, M.A.B. & Manuel, S.K.J. (2021). Emergency remote teaching experience: Challenges, actions and suggested measures of STEM research teachers in Pangasinan Philippines. International Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Management, 1(2), 150-161. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5726572", "Duncan, K., Kenworthy, A. & McNamara, R. (2012). The Effect of Synchronous and Asynchronous Participation on Students' Performance in Online Accounting Courses. Accounting Education, 21:4, 431-449, DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2012.673387", "Far\u0131s\u0131, M.\u0130. (2013). Academic Dishonesty In Distance Higher Education: \nChallenges And Models For Moral Education In The Digital Era. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14 (4), 176-195. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/16898/176100", "Graves, M.S. (2008). Students Cheating Habits: A Predictor of Workplace Deviance. Journal of Diversity Management, 3(1), 15-22. https://doi:10.19030/jdm.v3i1.4977", "Hosny M. & Fatima S. (2014). Journal of Applied Sciences: Attitude of Students Towards Cheating and Plagiarism. University Case Study, 14(8), 748-757.", "Howard, R.M. (2000). The Ethics of Plagiarism. In: The Ethics of Writing Instructions: Issues in Theory and Practice, Pemberton, M.A. (Ed). Ablex, Stamford, CT., USA, pp. 79-89.", "Khare, A. & Lam, H. (2008). Assessing Student Achievement and Progress with Online \tExaminations: Some Pedagogical and Technical Issues. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(3), 383-402. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/23620/", "Lim, R.A. & Arcilla Jr., F.E. (2021). Mobile assisted language learning: Perspectives from senior high school students. International Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Management, 1(2), 108-118. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5726387", "Long, E. (2020). Cheating in School is at an All-Time High. https://www.blhsnews.com/opinion/2020/03/02/cheating-in-school-is-at-an-all-time-high/", "Ma, H.J., G. Wan, E.Y. & Lu. (2008). Digital Cheating and Plagiarism in Schools. Theory Into Practice, 47:197-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802153809", "Mackay, J. & Munoz, A. (2019). An online testing design choice typology towards cheating", "McCabe, D., Butterfield, K. & Trevi\u00f1o, L. (2012). Cheating in college: Why students do it and what educators can do about it. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/18818", "Mendonca, M., Okada, A., & Scott, P. (2015). Effective web videoconferencing for proctoring online oral exams: A case study at scale in Brazil. Open Praxis, 7 (3), 227-242. https://doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.542913013965904", "Nie, D., Panfilova, E., Samusenkov, V., Mikhaylov, A. (2020). E-Learning Financing Models in Russia for \tSustainable Development. Sustainability, 12, 4412. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114412", "Penn SU (2021). Guide to Evaluating Severity of Academic Misconduct.", "Smart, A. (2020). 12 Effects of Cheating in College: Examples and Solutions. https://gradebees.com", "Sottile, J. & Watson, G. (2010). Cheating in the Digital Age: Do Students Cheat More in Online Courses? https://w ww.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring131/watson131.html", "Starovoytova, D., & Namango, S., (2016). Factors Affecting Cheating-Behavior at Undergraduate-\tEngineering. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(31), 75-78. ISSN 2222-1735 threat minimisation. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(3).", "Tolman, S. (2017). Academic Dishonesty in Online Courses: Considerations for Graduate Preparatory Programs in Higher Education. College Student Journal, 51(4), 579-584 https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/prin/csj/2017/00000051/00000004/art00014", "Upen. (2018). Descriptive and Experimental Research. https://pediaa.com/difference-between-descriptive-and-experimental-research/", "Wageningen University & Research. What is Fishbowl Method.\thttp://www.mspguide.org/tool/fish-bowl", "Wilkinson, J. (2009). Staff and student perceptions of plagiarism and cheating. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 98\u2013105. ISSN 1812-9129", "Witte, A.S. (2008). Speeding is Okay and Cheating is Cool. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council 9(2). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/64/"]}

In time of pandemic, synchronous and asynchronous learning occurred as a form of distance learning implemented by the Commission on Higher Education and the Department of Education. This research entitled “Academic Dishonesty Cheating in Synchronous and Asynchronous Classes: A Proctored Examination Intervention” was conducted to identify the self-report and types of assessment stated by the respondents. It also determined the effectiveness of proctored synchronous and asynchronous examination in preventing the cheating practices of students. The researchers used a quantitative research design and three adapted questionnaires with 40 participants. The results generated from the questionnaires were analyzed using frequency, percentage, and Mann-Whitney U test. The results obtained the following: most students cheated on assignments, exams, or quizzes; the primary reasons for student dishonesty were stress and worry essentially, and homework was the kind of evaluation that enabled pupils to cheat. Proctored exams provide similar results regardless of whether the exams were conducted asynchronously or synchronously. The following findings on the impact of proctored synchronous and asynchronous exams on students revealed that: most students will be less likely to cheat in a proctored examination. Most of the students believed that these proctored examinations would be a good solution in monitoring remote learning. Therefore, proctored synchronous and asynchronous examinations prevent the academic dishonesty or cheating practices of students.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Technology, Science, T, academic dishonesty cheating, Q, Cheating, Academic dishonesty, Synchronous and asynchronous examinations, L, synchronous and asynchronous examinations, Education

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 102
    download downloads 58
  • 102
    views
    58
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
5
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
102
58
Green
gold
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
Related to Research communities