Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Since 2016, the United Nation’s High Commissioner for Refugees, the European Commission, the African Union, and many states endeavoring to follow suit, have been introducing new policies to bolster international collaboration on refugee protection. These new policy initiatives have, however, created controversy within the international society. A public site where this is the most visible is social media. In this paper, we study the impact of the UN, the EU, national states, political parties, and NGOs in public communication on Twitter during key international protection policy events. We study the periods around the UN General Assembly’s adoption of the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants (19 September 2016), the UN General Assembly’s affirmation of the Global Migration Compact and the Global Refugee Compact (19 December 2018), and the First Global Refugee Forum (17-18 December 2019), and the European Commission’s announcement the New Pact on Migration and Asylum (23 September 2020). By using the tools of social network analysis (Wasserman & Faust, 1994), we compare the (i) activity, (ii) popularity, (iii) bridging (control of communication flow), and (iv) constraint (filling structural communication gaps) of institutions from the UN, the EU, selected national governments, and NGOs on Twitter in connection with these important policymaking events. By using the above-mentioned indicators, this paper identifies the public communication challenges encountered by global and transnational actors like the UNHCR and the European Commission. Which structural communication gaps are there in the global and European networks around the UN and EU institutions in social media? How can they be closed to reach and influence a broader spectrum of policy actors?
influence, Refugee Protection, Refugee, United Nations, social network analysis, social media, Twitter, communication gaps, Policy Actors, PROTECT Consortium, Political Communication, European Union
influence, Refugee Protection, Refugee, United Nations, social network analysis, social media, Twitter, communication gaps, Policy Actors, PROTECT Consortium, Political Communication, European Union
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 68 | |
| downloads | 36 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts