Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Contesting What Constitutes EdTech Success

Authors: Hackman, Salomey Tardy; Reindl, Stefan;

Contesting What Constitutes EdTech Success

Abstract

With the rise of technology integration in education, much of its success is measured based on improving students' learning outcomes and experiences in Education Technology (EdTech)-supported classrooms and entirely online-based education settings, where access (for example, to a reliable network connection and laptop computers or smartphones) is implicitly assumed. Similarly, a large majority of the conversation about EdTech is dominated by notions of potential for high education quality, efficiency for teachers and administrators, and detailed learner data to inform quick decision-making. On the other hand, existing research is silent on including equitable access, replicability, institutional factors, and conditions as critical variables for evaluating EdTech success. In light of this, this paper contests what constitute EdTech success. It contends that to meaningfully reinterpret what success could (and should) mean for EdTech, it is necessary to first reframe one’s understanding of Tech from focusing on the latest high-tech towards a holistic concept of Tech. Based on this shift, the paper further asserts that success for such a reframed understanding of EdTech can (and should) include aspects of widening access and inclusion of previously excluded learners, rather than improvements for those already privileged with access to education. In the spirit of the International Society of Comparative Education Science and Technology’s (ISCEST) VIII Conference theme, ‘Reinterpreting Success,’ the paper aims to contribute to the still relatively small critical voice and perspective on education technology in a field dominated by an overall optimistic, if not euphoric, tone of potential and promise.

Related Organizations
Keywords

EdTech, education technology, evaluation, success, context, access, inclusion.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 9
    download downloads 8
  • 9
    views
    8
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
9
8
Green
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
Related to Research communities