Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1002/adma.202107764 , 10.5281/zenodo.5793930 , 10.5281/zenodo.5793929 , 10.5281/zenodo.6353497
pmid: 34826883
handle: 10486/700679
doi: 10.1002/adma.202107764 , 10.5281/zenodo.5793930 , 10.5281/zenodo.5793929 , 10.5281/zenodo.6353497
pmid: 34826883
handle: 10486/700679
AbstractTemperature of tissues and organs is one of the first parameters affected by physiological and pathological processes, such as metabolic activity, acute trauma, or infection‐induced inflammation. Therefore, the onset and development of these processes can be detected by monitoring deviations from basal temperature. To accomplish this, minimally invasive, reliable, and accurate measurement of the absolute temperature of internal organs is required. Luminescence nanothermometry is the ideal technology for meeting these requirements. Although this technique has lately undergone remarkable developments, its reliability is being questioned due to spectral distortions caused by biological tissues. In this work, how the use of bright Ag2S nanoparticles featuring temperature‐dependent fluorescence lifetime enables reliable and accurate measurement of the absolute temperature of the liver in mice subjected to lipopolysaccharide‐induced inflammation is demonstrated. Beyond the remarkable thermal sensitivity (≈ 3% °C–1 around 37 °C) and thermal resolution obtained (smaller than 0.3 °C), the results included in this work set a blueprint for the development of new diagnostic procedures based on the use of intracorporeal temperature as a physiological indicator.
Inflammation, Luminescence, Organ-temperature monitoring, Nanothermometry, Temperature, Física, Reproducibility of Results, Mice, Temperature-dependent fluorescence lifetime, Liver, Animals, High thermal sensitivity
Inflammation, Luminescence, Organ-temperature monitoring, Nanothermometry, Temperature, Física, Reproducibility of Results, Mice, Temperature-dependent fluorescence lifetime, Liver, Animals, High thermal sensitivity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 91 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts