Views provided by UsageCounts
This vignette-based study (N = 15466; Mage = 51.65) examined how health care workers could foster reflection about and intentions to get vaccinated against COVID-19 by experimentally varying their communication style (i.e., autonomy-supportive vs. controlling) and the reference to external strategies (i.e., use of a monetary voucher or corona pass vs. the lack thereof). An autonomy-supportive, relative to a controlling, communication style was scored as more effective and came with more reflection about and intentions to get vaccinated due to enhanced autonomy need satisfaction. Vouchers were perceived as a less effective strategy than the corona pass, thereby even impairing reflection and vaccination intention relative to a control group by forestalling the need for autonomy. Especially hesitant citizens were prone to the negative effects of a controlling style and vouchers, while refusing individuals were less affected by any type of motivational attempt. The findings highlight the critical role of autonomy support in promoting reflection about and a self-endorsed decision to get vaccinated.
motivating communication style, self-determination theory, vaccine, COVID-19, health care workers
motivating communication style, self-determination theory, vaccine, COVID-19, health care workers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 18 |

Views provided by UsageCounts