Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Aedes (Ochlerotatus) annulipes

Authors: Kirik, Heli; Tummeleht, Lea; Kurina, Olavi;

Aedes (Ochlerotatus) annulipes

Abstract

3. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) annulipes (Meigen, 1830) (Fig. 2C) Published sources: Remm (1957: 154), Burtin (2014: 43), Kirik et al. (2021: 11, as part of the Aedes (Ochlerotatus) annulipes group). Voucher material: 1♀, Mändjala (58° 12′ 56″ N, 22° 19′ 56″ E), 16.VI.2015, L. Tummeleht leg., H. Kirik det., Mosquito Magnet trap, IZBE0210241, GenBank: OK465167; 1♂, Omedu (58° 45′ 09″ N, 27° 02′ 23″ E), 06.VI.2015, O. Kurina leg., O. Kurina det., sweep net, IZBE021218. Comment: Aedes annulipes belongs to the Ae. annulipes group, along with Ae. cantans (Meigen, 1818), Ae. cyprius Ludlow, 1920, Ae. euedes Howard, Dyar & Knab, 1913, Ae. excrucians (Walker, 1956), Ae. flavescens (Müller, 1764), Ae. riparius Dyar & Knab, 1907, etc. (Becker et al. 2020). Aedes annulipes can be morphologically distinguished from others species of the group, but this can be difficult when it comes to adult females. This is because of the variability in their morphological traits as well as inconclusive DNA evidence, making species identification time and resource extensive. For the purposes of this study, mosquitoes with morphology similar to Ae. annulipes were designated as specimens of the Ae. annulipes group. In total, 2,091 individuals (8.6% of all specimens collected) were identified as simply belonging to the group. These mosquitoes were active from May to October, but were most numerous in June. Two specimens, which corresponded well to both the morphological description of Ae. annulipes and the partial COI sequences found in online databases, were chosen as the local voucher specimens.

Published as part of Kirik, Heli, Tummeleht, Lea & Kurina, Olavi, 2022, Rediscovering the mosquito fauna (Diptera: Culicidae) of Estonia: an annotated checklist with distribution maps and DNA evidence, pp. 261-287 in Zootaxa 5094 (2) on page 265, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.2.3, http://zenodo.org/record/5965149

Related Organizations
Keywords

Insecta, Culicidae, Arthropoda, Aedes, Diptera, Animalia, Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Aedes annulipes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
  • 4
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
Related to Research communities