Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2007
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2007
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2007
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Paracedicus Fet 1993

Authors: Levy, Gershom;

Paracedicus Fet 1993

Abstract

Paracedicus Fet, 1993 Paracedicus Fet, 1993: 74, subgenus; type-species by original designation: Cedicus ephthalitus Fet, 1993; elevated to genus rank by Marusik & Guseinov (2003). Diagnosis. Robust, medium-sized spiders, 4.8–8.5 mm body length. Generally rather similar to Cedicus in somatic features: body shape, eye sizes and their arrangement, cheliceral dentition, large colulus and order of leg lengths. The two genera can be separated by genitalic characters. The shape of the male palpal embolus differs distinctly in the two genera, in addition Paracedicus bears a large median apophysis (sensu Fet 1993), absent in Cedicus. From Cedicoides and Cedicus it differs by the absence of a marked tegular apophysis (sensu Fet; “terminal apophysis” sensu Marusik & Guseinov 2003). The epigynal plates of the females of all three genera resemble each other closely but can be separated by the different shapes of the inner spermathecae. Comments. Following Fet’s (1993) revision of Cedicus taxa, I ranked only Charitonov’s (1946) subgenus Cedicoides as a separate genus alongside Cedicus (Levy 1996). Reviewing, however, the new species described below, I accede also to Fet’s (1993) distinction of his Paracedicus. Paracedicus is known so far by three species distributed in Azerbaijan and Turkmenia. Its occurrence in Israel is a marked extension of its range of distribution. The two new species described below differ markedly in size from each other; their drawings, nevertheless, were made to the same scale.

Published as part of Levy, Gershom, 2007, Calommata (Atypidae) and new spider species (Araneae) from Israel, pp. 1-30 in Zootaxa 1551 on pages 7-8, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.178107

Keywords

Cybaeidae, Arthropoda, Paracedicus, Arachnida, Animalia, Araneae, Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
Green