Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This dataset includes the training data used to produce the emulator for the paper, the code used to generate the emulator and invert it, and the scripts used to produce the figures. These data and scripts are provided as-is. Abstract: Understanding the evolution of massive binary stars requires accurate estimates of their masses. This understanding is critically important because massive star evolution can potentially lead to gravitational wave sources such as binary black holes or neutron stars. For Wolf-Rayet stars with optically thick stellar winds, their masses can only be determined with accurate inclination angle estimates from binary systems which have spectroscopic $M \sin i$ measurements. Orbitally-phased polarization signals can encode the inclination angle of binary systems, where the Wolf-Rayet winds act as scattering regions. We investigated four Wolf-Rayet + O star binary systems, WR 42, WR 79, WR 127, and WR 153, with publicly available phased polarization data to estimate their masses. To avoid the biases present in analytic models of polarization while retaining computational expediency, we used a Monte Carlo radiative transfer model accurately emulated by a neural network. We used the emulated model to investigate the posterior distribution of parameters of our four systems. Our mass estimates calculated from the estimated inclination angles put strong constraints on existing mass estimates for three of the systems, and disagrees with the existing mass estimates for WR 153. We recommend a concerted effort to obtain polarization observations that can be used to estimate the masses of Wolf-Rayet binary systems and increase our understanding of their evolutionary paths.
bayesian statistics, binary stars, machine learning, wolf-rayet, radiative transfer, massive stars, emulator, polarimetry
bayesian statistics, binary stars, machine learning, wolf-rayet, radiative transfer, massive stars, emulator, polarimetry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts