Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2014
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2014
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2014
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Clausiliidae

Authors: Salvador, Rodrigo B.;
Abstract

Clausiliidae indet. (Figs. 6–8) Material examined. BSPG 1952 XVIII 36 (1 spcm.), 37 (6 spcm.). Previous identification of the material. Gall (1980: Nr. 19 and 20): respectively, Pseudidyla moersingensis (Boettger) and Clausiliidae gen. et sp. indet. Discussion. Due to the very fragmentary nature of the present specimens, a more precise identification is not feasible. Nevertheless, it should be noted that there are two distinct morphs of spire tops: one larger, with higher whorls (Fig. 6), and one smaller, with the whorls more closely packed together and growing more quickly in width (Fig. 7). There is also a single apertural fragment (Fig. 8) that was identified by Gall (1980) as Pseudidyla moersingensis (Boettger), a species known from the Middle to Late Miocene of Germany (Nordsieck 1981a, 1982). Its overall shape and dentition seem to indicate the genus Pseudidyla (Boettger 1877), but due to the fragmentary nature of the present specimens, it is impossible to safely assign them to P. moersingensis. Moreover, Gall (1980: Nr. 18) also lists another clausiliid, Serrulina ptycholarynx (Boettger), for Gündlkofen; however, as explained above, the lot unfortunately could not be found at the BSPG collection. It should be noted, however, that Nordsieck (1981b) classified Gall’s S. ptycholarynx as a new subspecies, Serrulastra (Serruplica) ptycholarynx galli Nordsieck, and figures the holotype (pl. 8, fig. 18), which consists in a fragmentary body whorl with an intact aperture. The shell sculpture, aperture shape and dentition is congruent with the group of genera Serrulastra Nordsieck, Serrulina Mousson and Serrulella Nordsieck in Zilch. The distinction between these genera, (and their myriad of subgenera, species and subspecies) is very tenuous and classification of fragmentary fossil material is thus further complicated. As such, the validity of this subspecies should be taken carefully. Finally, the only thing that can be safely said about the clausiliids from Gündlkofen is that they represent two species, one probably belonging to the genus Pseudidyla and the other to Serrulastra or Serrulina and likely the species S. ptycholarynx. Paleoecological remarks. Nordsieck (2007) suggests that clausiliids up to the Middle Miocene were mostly wood-dwelling animals, preferring humid and warm environments.

Published as part of Salvador, Rodrigo B., 2014, The fossil land and freshwater snails of Gündlkofen (Middle Miocene, Germany), pp. 271-287 in Zootaxa 3785 (2) on page 274, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3785.2.9, http://zenodo.org/record/224845

Keywords

Stylommatophora, Mollusca, Gastropoda, Animalia, Clausiliidae, Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
Green
Related to Research communities