Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Mikrokosmos-difficulty dataset

Authors: Pedro Ramoneda;

Mikrokosmos-difficulty dataset

Abstract

We introduce score difficulty classification as a subtask of music information retrieval (MIR), which may be used in music education technologies, for personalised curriculum generation, and score retrieval. For this purpose, we introduce a novel dataset for the task, Mikrokosmos-difficulty, containing 147 symbolic piano pieces and the corresponding difficulty labels derived by its composer Béla Bartók and the publishers. About the dataset Béla Bartók’s Mikrokosmos Sz. 107 is a collection of 153 piano pieces published in six volumes between 1926 and 1939 and progressively ranked in terms of difficulty. Individual compositions go from extremely simple and easy beginner exercises to challenging advanced technical musical works. We propose the Mikrokosmos-difficulty dataset based on a subset of 146 pieces from the Mikrokosmos collection, discarding the 7 pieces composed for four hands performance. We group the pieces on three levels of difficulty according to the original classification in the editions by the publishers Wiener and Henle Verlag. Correspondingly, the beginner level contains the pieces 1-66 (Volumes I and II), the moderate level contains the pieces 67-121 (Volumes III and IV), the professional level contains the pieces 122-153 (Volumes V and VI). The 6-volume-long collection is obtained from IMSLP in pdf format. The conversion to machine-readable symbolic representations in musicXML was done semi-automatically using a commercial Optical Music Recognition (OMR) software, and manual corrections. The statistics are presented in the next table Beginner Moderate Professional n scores 62 54 31 n notes μ = 108.58 σ = 57.16 μ = 260.40 σ = 111.00 μ = 650.06 σ = 322.15 n bars μ = 20.37 σ = 9.64 μ = 33.35 σ = 13.27 μ = 63.12 σ = 29.30 tempo μ = 107.25 σ = 24.48 μ = 112.62 σ = 59.75 μ = 182.45 σ = 113.13 where we can see that Mikrokosmos-difficulty dataset is biased in lengths and tempo. Therefore, analyzing the technique difficulty in this dataset requires robustness to variations in length and tempo. For more information and citation, please refer to the paper: @inproceedings{Ramoneda2022, author = {Pedro Ramoneda and Nazif Can Tamer and Vsevolod Eremenko and Marius Miron and Xavier Serra}, title = {Score difficulty analysis for piano performance education based on fingering}, booktitle = {ICASSP 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing}, year = {2022}}

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities