Fejervarya manoharani sp. nov. http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D9AF4ACC-6820-44EA-8A06-79DA7E39DAB7 Manoharan’s Burrowing Frog (Tables 1–7; Figs. 1–6, 8, 11) Etymology. This species is named for Mr TM Manoharan, who severed as the Head of Kerala Forest Department for over a decade, for providing encouragement as well as personal financial support to SDB during the initial phases of his scientific career. The species epithet manoharani is treated as a noun in the genitive case. Holotype. ZSI/ WGRC /V/A/945, an adult male, from Chathankod-Bonnacaud (0840’24.0’’N 7709’12.25’’E, 460 m asl), Thiruvananthapuram district, Kerala state, India, collected by SDB and SG on 0 4 August 2013. Paratypes. ZSI/ WGRC /V/A/946–947, two adult males, and ZSI/ WGRC /V/A/948–949, two adult females, collected along with the holotype; ZSI/ WGRC /V/A/950, an adult male, from the same locality as holotype, collected by SDB and SG on 24 June 2015. Other referred material. SDBDU 2013.2669, collected along with the holotype; SDBDU 2011.275, from Kattalapara, Shendurney WLS (08°55’04.6’’N 77°05’43.2’’E, 130 m asl), Kollam district, Kerala state, India, collected by SDB and team on 0 3 September 2011. These samples were only used for genetic identification. Genetic relationship. Phylogenetically, Fejervarya manoharani sp. nov. is nested in the Fejervarya rufescens group (Figs. 1–2) of the Western Ghats. The average uncorrected pairwise genetic divergences with other members of the group are: 4.4% (range 4.1–4.9%, N = 28) for 16S, 10.4% (range 10.1–10.6%, N = 15) for COI, and 11.0% (range 10.8–11.5%, N = 15) for Cytb with F. rufescens; 5.6% (5.6–5.8%, N = 16) for 16S, 11.7% (range 11.7–11.8%, N = 9) for COI, and 14.4% (range 14.1–14.6%, N = 9) for Cytb with F. cepfi sp. nov.; and 4.5% (N = 4) for 16S, 9.3% (N = 3) for COI, and 12.5% (range 12.3–12.5%, N = 3) for Cytb with F. kadar sp. nov. (Table 2). For comparison with F. neilcoxi sp. nov. see ‘Genetic relationship’ section of that species. Diagnosis. Fejervarya manoharani sp. nov. can be distinguished from known congeners by the following combination of morphological characters: (1) medium male adult size (SVL 28.1–30.0 mm, N = 4); (2) stout body; (3) snout rounded in dorsal view and vertical in lateral view; (4) presence of rictal gland at labial commissure of the mouth; (5) head wider than long (male HW/HL ratio 105.5–107.7%, N = 4); (6) horizontal diameter of eye nearly equal to snout length (male EL/SL ratio 93.0–97.6%, N = 4); (7) tympanum diameter less than half of eye length, (male TYD/EL ratio 35.0–36.6%, N = 4); (8) tympanum to eye distance nearly equal to tympanum diameter (male TYE/TYD ratio 92.9–100%, N = 4); (9) inter upper eyelid width narrower than upper eyelid width (male IUE/ UEW ratio 56.7–66.7%, N = 4) and internarial distance (male IUE/IN ratio 68.0–79.2%, N = 4); (10) prominent shovel-shaped inner metatarsal tubercle prominent and small outer metatarsal tubercle; (11) webbing between toes small. Morphological comparison. Based on the overall morphology and comparable body size, Fejervarya manoharani sp. nov. could be confused with the known species F. rufescens and three new species F. cepfi sp. nov., F. kadar sp. nov. and F. neilcoxi sp. nov. However, Fejervarya manoharani differs from F. rufescens by its prominently glandular dorsal skin with interrupted linear warts (vs. shagreened to granular without prominent warts); snout rounded in dorsal view (vs. subovoid) and vertical in lateral view (vs. rounded); relatively smaller snout-vent size, male SVL 28.1–30.0 mm, N = 4 (vs. larger, male SVL 30.5–35.8 mm, N = 6); head wider than long, male HW 11.2–11.7 mm, HL 10.4–11.0 mm, HW/HL ratio 105.5–107.7%, N = 4 (vs. nearly equal, male HW 11.1–12.9 mm, HL 11.0– 12.7 mm, HW/HL ratio 100.8–101.6%, N = 6); tympanum to eye distance nearly equal to tympanum diameter, male TYE 1.3–1.4 mm, TYD 1.4–1.5 mm, TYE/TYD ratio 92.9–100%, N = 4 (vs. shorter, TYE 1.1–1.3 mm, TYD 1.6–2.2 mm, TYE/ TYD ratio 50.0–76.5% N = 6); thigh length shorter than foot length, male TL 12.9–13.5 mm, FOL 14.4–14.9 mm, TL/FOL ratio 86.6–91.0%, N = 4 (vs. nearly equal, male TL 14.7–15.8 mm, FOL 14.8–15.9 mm, TL/FOL ratio 98.0–99.4%, N = 6); shank length shorter than foot length, male SHL 13.2–13.8 mm, FOL 14.4–14.9 mm, SHL/ FOL ratio 89.9–92.6%, N = 4 (vs. nearly equal, male SHL 14.5–15.8 mm, FOL 14.8–15.9 mm, SHL/FOL ratio 97.3–99.4%, N = 6); and relatively less webbing between toes, male I2– 2II 2– –3– III2–3 1/ 3IV 3 1/3– 2V, specifically the fourth toe webbing below the second subarticular tubercle on either side (vs. more webbing, male I2 – – 2II 2– –3–III2– 3IV 3– 2V, specifically the fourth toe webbing extending up to the second subarticular tubercle on either side). Fejervarya manoharani differs from F. cepfi by its dorsal skin with relatively more prominent glandular warts (vs. less); snout vertical in lateral view (vs. obtuse) and rounded in dorsal view (vs. subovoid); head wider than long, male HL 10.4–11.0 mm, HW 11.2–11.7 mm, HW/HL ratio 105.5–107.7%, N = 4 (vs. head length nearly equal to head width, male HL 11.1–12.4 mm, HW 11.2–12.2 mm, HW/HL ratio 98.4–100.9%, N = 2); horizontal diameter of eye relatively larger or nearly equal to snout length, male EL 3.9–4.1 mm, SL 4.0– 4.4 mm, EL/SL ratio 93.0–97.6%, N = 4 (vs. smaller, male EL 3.4–3.5 mm, SL 4.6–4.8 mm, EL/SL ratio 72.9–73.9%, N = 2); tympanum diameter less than half of horizontal diameter of eye, male TYD 1.4–1.5 mm, EL 3.9–4.1 mm, TYD/EL ratio 35.0–36.6%, N = 4 (vs. nearly half, male TYD 1.8 mm, EL 3.4–3.5 mm, TYD/EL ratio 51.4–52.9%, N = 2); tympanum to eye distance equal or nearly equal to tympanum diameter, male TYE 1.3–1.4 mm, TYD 1.4–1.5 mm, TYE/TYD ratio 92.9–100%, N = 4 (vs. relatively shorter, male TYE 1.5–1.6 mm, TYD 1.8 mm, TYE/TYD ratio 83.3–88.9%, N = 2); inter upper eyelid width narrower than upper eyelid width, male IUE 1.7–2.0 mm, UEW 3.0 mm, IUE/UEW ratio 56.7–66.7%, N = 4 (vs. nearly equal, male IUE 2.4–2.5 mm, UEW 2.5–2.6 mm, IUE/UEW ratio 96.0–96.2%, N = 2); inter upper eyelid width narrower than internarial distance, male IUE 1.7–2.0 mm, IN 2.4–2.6 mm, IUE/IN ratio 68.0–79.2%, N = 4 (vs. nearly equal, male IUE 2.4–2.5 mm, IN 2.5 mm, IUE/IN ratio 96–100%, N = 2); relatively less webbing between toes, male I2– 2II 2– –3– III2–3 1/ 3IV 3 1/3– 2V (vs. more, male I1 +–2– II1 +–3–III2– 3IV 3–1 1/ 2V). Fejervarya manoharani differs from F. kadar by its dorsal skin with more prominent glandular warts (vs. scattered glandular warts); snout vertical in lateral view (vs. obtuse); relatively smaller snout-vent size, male SVL 28.1–30.0 mm, N = 4 (vs. larger, male SVL 31.0– 33.5 mm, N = 3); eye length relatively longer than head length, male EL 3.9–4.1 mm, HL 10.4–11.0 mm, EL/HL ratio 36.7 – 37.5%, N = 4 (vs. shorter, male EL 4.0– 4.2 mm, HL 11.7–12.1 mm, EL/HL ratio 33.6–34.7%, N = 3); forearm length relatively shorter than hand length, male FAL 5.1–5.4 mm, HAL 6.4–6.9 mm, FAL/HAL ratio 76.8–79.7%, N = 4 (vs. longer, male FAL 5.7–6.2 mm, HAL 6.6–7.1 mm, FAL/HAL ratio 85.3–87.3%, N = 3); and relatively more webbing between toes, male I2– 2II 2– –3– III2–3 1/ 3IV 3 1/3– 2V, specifically the fourth toe webbing extending close to the second subarticular tubercle on either side (vs. less, male I2 – –2– II2 – –3– III2–3 2/ 3IV 3 2/3– 2V, specifically the fourth toe webbing extending slightly above the third subarticular tubercle on either side). For differences with Fejervarya neilcoxi see ‘morphological comparison’ of that species. Description of holotype (measurements in mm). Adult male (SVL 30.0), rather stout; head wider than long (HW 11.7, HL 11.0); snout rounded in dorsal view and vertical in lateral view, its length (SL 4.4) longer than horizontal diameter of eye (EL 4.1); loreal region acute with rounded canthus rostralis; interorbital space flat (IUE 2.0), narrower than upper eyelid width (UEW 3.0) and internarial distance (IN 2.6); nostril nearly as close to tip of snout (NS 1.9) and to eye (EN 2.0); tympanum (TYD 1.5) 36.6% of eye diameter (EL 4.1); tympanum-eye distance (TYE 1.4) subequal to the tympanum diameter (TYD 1.5); supratympanic fold well developed, extends from posterior corner of eye to near the shoulder; vomerine ridge present, bearing small teeth, at an angle of 45° to the body axis, as close to choanae as to each other; tongue moderately large, emarginated, bearing no median lingual process; rictal gland present at labial commissure of the mouth. Arms short, forearm length (FAL 5.4) shorter than hand length (HAL 6.8); relative length of fingers IV

Published as part of Garg, Sonali & Biju, S. D., 2017, Description of four new species of Burrowing Frogs in the Fejervarya rufescens complex (Dicroglossidae) with notes on morphological affinities of Fejervarya species in the Western Ghats, pp. 451-490 in Zootaxa 4277 (4) on pages 478-481, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4277.4.1, http://zenodo.org/record/829833