Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2018
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2018
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2018
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Aspidolopha nigrocurvilinea Bryant 1934

Authors: Faisal, Mohammad; Singh, Sudhir;

Aspidolopha nigrocurvilinea Bryant 1934

Abstract

Aspidolopha nigrocurvilinea Bryant, 1934: 227. (Fig. 13) There is one paratype in NFIC with five labels- Label 1: White label stating collection locality '(INDIA: Tamil Nadu), North Salem, Ayur; 1.vi.1930; collected by FRI Sandal Insect Survey'. Label 2: Small white label with number '421'. Label 3: White label—' Aspidolopha nigrocurvilinea Bryant (hand written), GE Bryant det.' Label 4: Yellow bordered white circular label stating 'Cotype'. Label 5: Yellow label with printed 'Cotype'. Remarks: Right antenna with scape only. Right fore leg with all tarsomeres missing. Comments: In the original description there is no clear mention either about number of specimens on which the species is described or their depository. But in the data there is mention of three numbers—'419, 420 and 421'' which are number mentioned on labels of specimens. In NFIC specimen bearing the number '421' is present with details as mentioned above. Specimen no. '419 and 420 are perhaps designated as type and cotype and deposited elsewhere.

Published as part of Faisal, Mohammad & Singh, Sudhir, 2018, Type specimens of Chrysomelidae and Megalopodidae (Coleoptera) in the National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun, India, pp. 509-529 in Zootaxa 4420 (4) on page 518, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4420.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/1455409

Keywords

Coleoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Chrysomelidae, Aspidolopha, Animalia, Biodiversity, Aspidolopha nigrocurvilinea, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
Related to Research communities