Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Overarching questions, new approaches and technologies in mixoplankton research. 2021 Mixoplankton International Workshop Report

Authors: FLYNN Kevin John; MITRA Aditee; GLIBERT Patricia; SMYTH Timothy;

Overarching questions, new approaches and technologies in mixoplankton research. 2021 Mixoplankton International Workshop Report

Abstract

Report from a workshop on mixoplankton research Session 1: Overarching Questions; The mixoplankton paradigm – is it significant? How do we make that judgement?; How can we use our current and emerging tools to understand/quantify the balance of photo- and phagotrophy in mixoplankton? ;Are we measuring the right things?; What are the major challenges to modelling? Session 2: New Approaches & Technologies; This session was centred on questions of ‘why?’, ‘how?’, ‘what?’, and critically, ‘who for?’; Why do we want to measure mixoplanktonic activity and how do we do this?; Remote sensing; Platforms: buoys, gliders; Optical and allied approaches; Molecular techniques Conclusion There is an increasing (and arguably belated) recognition that routine monitoring of zooplankton as well as phototrophic plankton is important in determining the health of coastal waters. Mixoplankton contribute to both primary and secondary productions (in crude terms, as ‘phytoplankton’ and ‘protozooplankton’ in one cell). The role of mixoplankton to food webs is important in a positive way as food organisms as well as for their negative impact as harmful and disruptive blooms (HABs and EDABs). Mixoplankton should be viewed as indicators of ecosystem health, not just of harmful conditions. The underlying basis for inclusion of mixoplankton is there; progress appears more limited by the need for a well-argued case in a language appropriate for stakeholders likely built in collaboration with those stakeholders. And, of course in the new deployment &/or re-purposing of traditional methods to monitoring.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Water Framework Directive, Harmful Algal Bloom, mixoplankton, roadmap, stakeholder

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
    download downloads 4
  • 2
    views
    4
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
4
Green