Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Physopelta (Neophysopelta) quadriguttata Bergroth 1894

Authors: Stehlík, Jaroslav L.;

Physopelta (Neophysopelta) quadriguttata Bergroth 1894

Abstract

Physopelta (Neophysopelta) quadriguttata Bergroth, 1894 Physopelta quadriguttata Bergroth, 1894: 160–161 (description, distribution). SYNTYPES: ♀♀, India, Sikkim (MZHF?). Physopelta quadriguttata: KIRKALDY & EDWARDS (1902): 165 (differences from Ph. indra); DISTANT (1903a): 98 (redescription, distribution; including Ph. indra); BERGROTH (1913): 167 (catalogue); ESAKI (1926): 157 (distribution); TAEUBER (1927): 176 and 177 (differences from Ph. lisae and Ph. roseni); HUSSEY (1929): 32 (catalogue, distribution); BLÖTE (1931): 100 (distribution); LIU (1981): 223–224, pl. 28 (key, redescription, figure); MANNA et al. (1985):621–630 (chromosomes, figures, distribution); Hu & Gui in ZHANG (1995): 111 (redescription, habitus, distribution, biology); HUA (2000): 187 (check-list, host plant, distribution); KERZHNER (2001): 246 (catalogue, distribution); STEHLÍK & JINDRA (2003): 7 (distribution); STEHLÍK (2004): 3 (distribution); MIYAMOTO et al. (2005): 11 –12 (habitus, distribution); STEHLÍK (2005a):144–145 (distribution); STEHLÍK (2007a): 127 (habitus, variability); RÉDEI et al. (2009): 13–14, 17, 48 (redescription, key, figures, distribution); VOTÝPKA et al. (2010): 246 (distribution); CHANDRA & KUSHWAHA (2012): 253 (distribution); ZHU et al. (2012): 195–198 (ecology, distribution). Physopelta (Physopelta) quadriguttata: VOIGT (2006): 224 (key, distribution). Material examined. CHINA: HAINAN: Jianfengling Mts., Tiachi Lake env., Bishu villa, 18°44′40″N 108°50′41″E, 950 m a.s.l., at light, 9.–11.v.2011, 1 ♂, M. Fikáček, V. Kubeček & L. Li lgt. (NMPC); Limushan Mts., first administr. Centre, 19°10′30″N 109°44′33″E, 630 m a.s.l., at light, 4.–6.v.2011, 1 ♀, M. Fikáček, V. Kubeček & L. Li lgt. (NMPC). – SICHUAN: Baoxing, 100 km N of Yaan, 12. – 17.vii.l995, 1 ♀, Z. Jindra lgt. (ZJPC); 70 km NW Chengdu, Qingohenghou Shan Mts., 1,500 m a.s.l., 6.–13.viii.2010, 3 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀, S. Murzin lgt. (NMPC); Qingchenghou Shan Mts., 70 km NW Chengdu, 1500 m a.s.l., 6.–13.viii.2010, 3♂♂ 2 ♀♀, S. Murzin lgt. (NMPC). – YUNNAN: Xima, Rk 12, 14°49′N 97°44′E, 2,080 m a.s.l., 11.vi.2001, 1♂, Deuve, Mantilleri, Rougerie & Tian lgt. (MNHN). – TAIWAN: CHIAYI COUNTY: Fenchihu, 1,400 m a.s.l., 3.v.1977, 1 ♂, S. Klapperich lgt. (EHIA). – HUALIEN COUNTY: S corner, Coastal Range SE of Fuli, 23°09′N 121°17′E, 500 m a.s.l., 12.–16.xi.2008, 36 ♂♂ 20♀♀, L. Dembický lgt. (MMBC); Hueisun, Experimental Forest Station, 700 m a.s.l., 3.viii.2002, 1 ♂, K. Schönitzer lgt. (ZSMC). – NANTOU COUNTY: Meifeng, 24°05′25″N 121°10′21″E, 2,200 m a.s.l., 10.–11.v.2001, 1 ♂, K. Schönitzer lgt. (ZSMC); ditto, 2,100 m a.s.l., 10.–11.ix.2002, 3 ♂♂ 6 ♀♀, K. Schönitzer lgt. (ZSMC). – PINGTUNG COUNTY: Pintung, Halen, Pettawushan, trail of 1,500 m a.s.l., 1.v.1992, 3 ♂♂, A. Smetana lgt. (MHNG). – TAITUNG COUNTY: 14 km W of Chihshang, 23°11′09″N 121°04′21″, 900 m a.s.l., 16.xi.2008, 20 ♂♂ 42 ♀♀, L. Dembický lgt. (MMBC, NMPC, BMNH). – VIETNAM: LAM DONG PROVINCE: Da Lat, 1,500 m a.s.l., 14.x.1988, 1♂ 1♀, 15.x.1988, 5♂♂ 3♀♀, T.Vásárhelyi lgt. (HNHM). – LAO CAI PROVINCE: 17 km Dang Khao, 29.xi.1931, 1 ♀, Topál & Matskási lgt. (HNHM); Sa Pa, v.1990, 3 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀, Duong Tat Tu & J. Picka lgt. (NMPC); Tonkin, Chapa [= Sa Pa], v.1916, 1 ♂ 1 ♀, R. V. de Salvaza lgt. (BMNH). – NGHE AN PROVINCE: Nghe An, 19°42.798′N 104°46.015′E, 800 m a.s.l., 8.–9.xi.1999, 1 ♂ 1 ♀, Kasai lgt. (HNHM). – SON LA PROVINCE: Moe Chau [= Moc Chau], 800 m a.s.l., on light: 24.x.1986, 1 ♂, 25.x.1986, 1 ♀, 26.x.1986, 1 ♂, T. Vásárhelyi lgt. (HNHM). – VINH PHU PROVINCE: Tam Dao, 8 km N of Hanoi, xi.1986, 1 ♂, P. Bílek lgt. (ZJPC); Tam Dao, 900 m a.s.l., 17.–21.iii.1990, 1 ♀, 17.–21.v.1990, 1 ♀, J. Horák lgt. (NMPC); J. Horák lgt. (NMPC); 18.v.2007, 1 ♂, V. Socha lgt. (NMPC). – YEN BAI PROVINCE: Luc Yen, 300 m a.s.l., 18.xi.1971, 1 ♀, Topál & Matskasi lgt. (HNHM). – LAOS: ATTAPEU PROVINCE: Annam Highlands Mts., Dong Ampan NBCA, Nong Fa (crater lake) env., 15°05.9′N 107°25.6′E, ca. 1,160 m.s.l., 30.iv.–4.v.2010, 3 ♀♀, J. Hájek lgt. (NMPC). – HOUA PHAN PROVINCE: Ban Saluei, Phu Phan Mt., 20°13′N 103°59′E, 1,300–2,000 m a.s.l., 6.–18.iv.2005, 1 ♀, J. Bezděk lgt., Z. Jindra det. (NMPC); 30 km S of Xam Neua, Phou Pan Mt., 1,500 m a.s.l., 6.–17.v.2004, 1 ♀, P. Kresl & F. Kantner lgt. (ZJPC); Phu Phan Mt., 20°12′N 104°01′E, 1,500–1,900 m a.s.l., 17.v.–3.vi.2007, 7 ♂♂ 5 ♀♀, M. Brancucci & V. Kubáň lgt. (MMBC, NMPC); Ban Saluei → Phou Pane Mt., 20°12–13.5′N 103°59.5′–104°01′E, 1340–1870 m a.s.l., 15.iv.–15.v.2008, Lao collectors lgt. (NMPC). – THAILAND: MAE HONG SON PROVINCE: Soppong, 19°27′N 98°20′E, 1,500 m a.s.l., 15.–17.xi.1996, 2 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀, S. Bečvář lgt. (MMBC). Distribution. China (Anhui, Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi, Sichuan, Yunnan, Xizang, Zhejiang, Hainan) (LIU 1981, Hu & Gui in ZHANG 1995, KERZHNER 2001, VOTÝPKA et al. 2010; this paper), Taiwan (ESAKI 1926, KERZHNER 2001, RÉDEI et al. 2009; this paper), Japan (Ryukyus) (MIYAMOTO et al. 2005), India (Madhya Pradesh, Nagaland, Sikkim, West Bengal) (BERGROTH 1894, DISTANT 1903a, BLÖTE 1931, MANNA et al. 1985, CHANDRA & KUSHWAHA 2012), Nepal (STEHLÍK 2004), Thailand (STEHLÍK & JINDRA 2003; this paper), Laos (STEHLÍK 2005a; this paper), Vietnam (new record). A record from Puducherry: Mayyazhi District (India) by DISTANT (1903a) belonging to Ph. indra, was erroneously considered as a junior synonym of Ph. quadriguttata in that paper.

Published as part of Stehlík, Jaroslav L., 2013, Review and reclassification of the Old World genus Physopelta (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Largidae), pp. 505-584 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 53 (2) on pages 540-541, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5739959

Related Organizations
Keywords

Hemiptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Physopelta quadriguttata, Biodiversity, Physopelta, Largidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
Green
Related to Research communities