Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

D1C.2 Tightness of distribution pipes

Authors: Kooiman, Arie; Lueb, Sander;

D1C.2 Tightness of distribution pipes

Abstract

As part of the national research programme HyDelta, an investigative study was carried out into tightness criteria for connecting pipelines if they are operated with hydrogen. The study as described in this report is part of work package 1C “Pipes and Indoor Installations” and concerns research question 124. This is as follows : Do the leak tightness requirements for a natural gas network also apply to a network operated with hydrogen? If this is not the case, what should the criteria be? The focus in this study is on service lines. The small leaks that need to be simulated (5 l/h on the basis of air) in main pipelines are so small (the route of the main pipeline is more extensive compared to a connecting pipe) that they will not lead to issues when hydrogen is used. Such minor leaks will not enter buildings, but will evaporate into the open air. The following activities were carried out with the aim of answering the above question: The leakage flow rates were measured at pressures of 30, 100 and 200 mbar with the media nitrogen, natural gas and hydrogen in four leaks that were created on purpose in connecting pipes with a nitrogen content of approximately 1 l/h. The ratios of the leakage flow rates were determined from these results. A theoretical consideration has been drawn up for assessing the risks of small hydrogen leaks using the maximum permissible leaks in NEN 7244-7 and the findings from the DNV GL report on the behaviour of hydrogen in leaks in the gas distribution network. The measurement results were reviewed in further detail and analysed, and subsequently combined with the theoretical risk assessment. The conclusions from this study are as follows: For new service lines, the same tightness requirements can be used for hydrogen as for natural gas. There is no reason to make the criteria more stringent. For existing connecting pipes, the tightness requirements must be made more stringent. The maximum permissible leakage rate for existing hydrogen service pipelines is 74% of that for natural gas. This has been determined on the basis of the following: The measured values give a factor of 1.83 higher leakage for hydrogen The assumption that the risks of ignition of a gas-air concentration < 8 vol% for hydrogen is lower than for natural gas with a concentration of 5.9 vol% These tightness requirements can be incorporated by extending NEN 7244-7, table 4 for hydrogen, which would then read as follows Maximum leak size at a test pressure equal to MOP Type of pipe Natural gas Max. leak rate [dm3/h] Hydrogen Max. leak rate [dm3/h] Main pipeline 5.0 5.0 Service pipeline - new* 0.2 0.2 Service pipeline - existing 1.0 0.7 Meter set-up 0.1 0.1 *A new pipeline may not leak unnecessarily as a result of installation errors or material faults. The maximum leakage rate of 0.2 l/h is feasible in practice and is therefore regarded as desirable for new connecting pipes. (Feasible in practice based on small allowable leaks from new components and varying measurement conditions). These requirements are the same for hydrogen and natural gas. This also applies to the meter set-up. The leak tightness tests for a hydrogen network can be carried out by extending the following sentence (in italics) in VWI G-12: An existing connecting pipe is considered leak tight if the test pressure drops ≤ 5 mbar during an overpressure measurement (at a constant temperature) (for hydrogen pipes: ≤ 4 mbar)

Dit project is medegefinancierd door TKI Nieuw Gas | Topsector Energie uit de PPS-toeslag onder referentienummer TKI2020-HyDelta.

Keywords

natural gas, hydrogen in the gas grid, hydrogen, hydrogen economy, hydelta, hythane

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 91
    download downloads 111
  • 91
    views
    111
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
91
111
Green